From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF5361EBA0D; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743689895; cv=none; b=otHiKaL8wCer7jnHe6MgjS+HcSWhe6QIFAMZHZca3qXjHlTqSRjaCHv34xitv4GE4XDQPRxyfPqNSJpf6HwdQwqQi9+7P+21EEPdOATo5f+Il60xx9aXMtyA+2dF+HgXHmi+t4XMMilgy5/kEkryQEREpLaocqfFXjVVyO0/4z8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743689895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Uy8VhtkwGnjgWhisPk852iAoDVSZJ1v9w+B0YXSVHg8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KyAg55GpeEfKkupd0ocFKO7e7QMyA4HkeZQ84a94IJjLEBBQMMdQdy5niE6XFJnWT+H9SqQiJ+4y4yzVmBgLTT9PUyLfbkHJw50TYdSQmx9+6lUf9gXXCiDdfPNFM0AktLWz98nkWvE9bjhIV0V4RgkODbCqKU20cj6ypH2rjkI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Ic/2PwvK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Ic/2PwvK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0047C4CEE3; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:18:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1743689895; bh=Uy8VhtkwGnjgWhisPk852iAoDVSZJ1v9w+B0YXSVHg8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ic/2PwvKwZFBLZja5vywSaemxyPGR/b+oYLjuRsfqN39ZyKJefDbR667Nji/IT4jM j9XP1oaaivoqbkWl3yHJxmzM2xMR4UCMVBaz12MecRunGf1UKNlisFVQOllNV4Lnbz LGnoWu5JiVQ9QBsdYcrq+rDtsnjJ2y9OopdAe8lw= Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:16:47 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Richard Akintola Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@inria.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: modify function name to kernel code style Message-ID: <2025040301-tightness-giveaway-a568@gregkh> References: <67ea5813.5d0a0220.293276.775e@mx.google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67ea5813.5d0a0220.293276.775e@mx.google.com> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:53:36AM +0100, Richard Akintola wrote: > Change camelCase function name sii164ResetChip to sii164_reset_chip > as reported by checkpatch.pl > > CHECK: Avoid camelCase: > > Signed-off-by: Richard Akintola > --- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c | 2 +- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) You sent 2 different patches with different subject lines, yet they almost did the same thing? Which one should I take or review? Please send a new one, as a version 3, and properly document what changed between this one and the last 2 submissions. thanks, greg k-h