linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Korah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@aol.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix instances of camel case
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:58:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025041758-mounting-populace-458f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417153101.353645-1-rubenru09@aol.com>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 04:27:47PM +0100, Ruben Wauters wrote:
> As per the kernel style guidelines, and as reported by checkpatch.pl,
> replaced instances of camel case with snake_case where appropriate and
> aligned names in the header with those in the c file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@aol.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 113 ++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h |  26 +++---
>  2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> index 89700fc5dd2e..20c2f386220c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
>  #define USE_HW_I2C
>  
>  #ifdef USE_HW_I2C
> -    #define i2cWriteReg sm750_hw_i2c_write_reg
> -    #define i2cReadReg  sm750_hw_i2c_read_reg
> +    #define I2C_WRITE_REG sm750_hw_i2c_write_reg
> +    #define I2C_READ_REG  sm750_hw_i2c_read_reg

Close, but these are really a function name, not a macro, right?

And what sets this #define?  If it's always enabled, then unwrap this
indirection instead of keeping it around

>  #else
> -    #define i2cWriteReg sm750_sw_i2c_write_reg
> -    #define i2cReadReg  sm750_sw_i2c_read_reg
> +    #define I2C_WRITE_REG sm750_sw_i2c_write_reg
> +    #define I2C_READ_REG  sm750_sw_i2c_read_reg
>  #endif
>  
>  /* SII164 Vendor and Device ID */
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>  
>  #ifdef SII164_FULL_FUNCTIONS
>  /* Name of the DVI Controller chip */
> -static char *gDviCtrlChipName = "Silicon Image SiI 164";
> +static char *dvi_controller_chip_name = "Silicon Image SiI 164";

This is a totally different thing.

>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> @@ -37,14 +37,14 @@ static char *gDviCtrlChipName = "Silicon Image SiI 164";
>   */
>  unsigned short sii164_get_vendor_id(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned short vendorID;
> +	unsigned short vendor;

Why change this?

This is a mix of lots of different changes, please break things up into
"one logical change per patch"

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-17 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250417153101.353645-1-rubenru09.ref@aol.com>
2025-04-17 15:27 ` [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix instances of camel case Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 16:58   ` Greg Korah-Hartman [this message]
2025-04-17 17:28     ` Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 17:46       ` Greg Korah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025041758-mounting-populace-458f@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rubenru09@aol.com \
    --cc=sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).