From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: simona@ffwll.ch, deller@gmx.de, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] fbcon: Move fbcon callbacks into struct fbcon_bitops
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 20:53:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905185358.GA361827@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818104655.235001-5-tzimmermann@suse.de>
Hi Thomas.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Depending on rotation settings, fbcon sets different callback
> functions in struct fbcon from within fbcon_set_bitops(). Declare
> the callback functions in the new type struct fbcon_bitops. Then
> only replace the single bitops pointer in struct fbcon.
>
> Keeping callbacks in constant instances of struct fbcon_bitops
> makes it harder to exploit the callbacks. Also makes the code slightly
> easier to maintain.
>
> For tile-based consoles, there's a separate instance of the bitops
> structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c | 17 ++++---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c | 67 +++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.h | 7 ++-
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon_ccw.c | 18 +++++---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon_cw.c | 18 +++++---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon_ud.c | 18 +++++---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/tileblit.c | 16 ++++---
> 7 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c
> index a2202cae0691..267bd1635a41 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c
> @@ -384,15 +384,18 @@ static int bit_update_start(struct fb_info *info)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static const struct fbcon_bitops bit_fbcon_bitops = {
> + .bmove = bit_bmove,
> + .clear = bit_clear,
> + .putcs = bit_putcs,
> + .clear_margins = bit_clear_margins,
> + .cursor = bit_cursor,
> + .update_start = bit_update_start,
> +};
> +
> void fbcon_set_bitops(struct fbcon *confb)
> {
> - confb->bmove = bit_bmove;
> - confb->clear = bit_clear;
> - confb->putcs = bit_putcs;
> - confb->clear_margins = bit_clear_margins;
> - confb->cursor = bit_cursor;
> - confb->update_start = bit_update_start;
> - confb->rotate_font = NULL;
> + confb->bitops = &bit_fbcon_bitops;
>
> if (confb->rotate)
> fbcon_set_rotate(confb);
fbcon_set_rotate() is only used to set the correct bitops.
It would be simpler to just do
if (confb->rotate)
confb->bitops = fbcon_rotate_get_ops();
And rename fbcon_set_rotate() to fbcon_rotate_get_ops() and return the
pointer to the struct.
The no need to pass the struct, and it is obvious that the bitops are
overwritten.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 10:36 [PATCH 0/6] fbcon: Move bitops callbacks into separate struct Thomas Zimmermann
2025-08-18 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] fbcon: Fix empty lines in fbcon.h Thomas Zimmermann
2025-09-05 19:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-08-18 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] fbcon: Rename struct fbcon_ops to struct fbcon Thomas Zimmermann
2025-08-19 0:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-05 18:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-08-18 10:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] fbcon: Set rotate_font callback with related callbacks Thomas Zimmermann
2025-09-05 18:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-08-18 10:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] fbcon: Move fbcon callbacks into struct fbcon_bitops Thomas Zimmermann
2025-09-05 18:53 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2025-09-08 13:06 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-09-08 18:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-09-09 7:04 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-08-18 10:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] fbcon: Streamline setting rotated/unrotated bitops Thomas Zimmermann
2025-08-18 10:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] fbcon: Pass struct fbcon to callbacks in struct fbcon_bitops Thomas Zimmermann
2025-09-05 19:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-09-08 13:08 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-09-30 19:47 ` Helge Deller
2025-09-05 6:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] fbcon: Move bitops callbacks into separate struct Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250905185358.GA361827@ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).