Linux Framebuffer Layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nils Lehnen <nils.lehnen@proton.me>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: sm750fb: remove dead VALIDATION_CHIP code
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:31:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026071837-ferocity-sixtyfold-7a4e@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718062027.5850-1-nils.lehnen@proton.me>

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 06:20:56AM +0000, Nils Lehnen wrote:
> VALIDATION_CHIP is defined nowhere in the tree, yet fourteen
> preprocessor conditionals in the sm750fb DDK files still test it.
> Patch 1 resolves all of them (dead branches dropped, always-true
> branches kept), as the driver TODO asks under "remove unused code";
> patch 2 cleans up the indentation and blank lines the removal leaves
> behind.
> 
> Verification, both patches: the disassembly of all ten sm750fb object
> files (objdump -d, x86, CONFIG_FB_SM750=m) is bit-identical across the
> series. Compile-tested only; no SM750 hardware available.
> 
> All English text in this series (cover letter, commit messages, code
> comments) was translated from a German draft with the assistance of
> Claude Fable 5.
> 
> v2: resend of v1 -- patch 1/2 of v1 arrived with an empty subject due
> to a local send mishap; no code changes.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260718055132.441-1-nils.lehnen@proton.me

Please wait a day or so between new versions, gives people a chance to
review what you sent and you to make changes based on it.

thanks,

greg k-h

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-18  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18  6:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: sm750fb: remove dead VALIDATION_CHIP code Nils Lehnen
2026-07-18  6:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: sm750fb: remove dead VALIDATION_CHIP conditionals Nils Lehnen
2026-07-18  6:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: sm750fb: unindent defines left by conditional removal Nils Lehnen
2026-07-18  6:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026071837-ferocity-sixtyfold-7a4e@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nils.lehnen@proton.me \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox