From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"kraxel@redhat.com" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"tzimmermann@suse.de" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
Linux-graphics-maintainer <Linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 21:55:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38473dcd-0666-67b9-28bd-afa2d0ce434a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de83ae8cb6de7ee7c88aa2121513e91bb0a74608.camel@vmware.com>
Hello Zack,
On 6/16/22 21:29, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 20:23 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The platform devices registered by sysfb match with firmware-based DRM or
>> fbdev drivers, that are used to have early graphics using a framebuffer
>> provided by the system firmware.
>>
[snip]
>
> Hi, Javier.
>
> This change broke arm64 with vmwgfx. We get a kernel oops at boot (let me know if
> you'd like .config or just have us test something directly for you):
>
Yes please share your .config and I'll try to reproduce on an arm64 machine.
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0000000000000008
> Mem abort info:
> ESR = 0x96000004
> EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> SET = 0, FnV = 0
> EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> Data abort info:
> ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
> CM = 0, WnR = 0
> user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000001787ee000
> [0000000000000008] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
> Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in: vmwgfx(+) e1000e(+) nvme ahci(+) xhci_pci drm_ttm_helper ttm
> sha256_arm64 sha1_ce nvme_core xhci_pci_renesas aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk aes>
> CPU: 3 PID: 215 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G U 5.18.0-rc5-vmwgfx
> #12
I'm confused, your kernel version seems to be 5.18.0-rc5 but this patch
is only in drm-misc-next now and will land in 5.20...
Did you backport it? Can you please try to reproduce with latest drm-tip ?
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-07 18:23 [PATCH v6 0/5] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-16 19:29 ` Zack Rusin
2022-06-16 19:55 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-06-16 21:03 ` Zack Rusin
2022-06-16 22:18 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-16 23:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-17 1:35 ` Zack Rusin
2022-06-17 6:46 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-07-04 9:36 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-07-04 10:29 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-07-04 11:04 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-07-04 12:11 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-07-04 12:22 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-07-04 12:22 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-06-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] Revert "fbdev: Prevent probing generic drivers if a FB is already registered" Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-09 11:49 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-06-09 13:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-09 17:23 ` Mark olpc_dcon BROKEN [Was: [PATCH v6 5/5] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c] Sam Ravnborg
2022-06-09 17:38 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-09 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38473dcd-0666-67b9-28bd-afa2d0ce434a@redhat.com \
--to=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=zackr@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).