* imsttfb warnings in 2.6.0-test4
@ 2003-09-06 4:15 Stephen M. Kenton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephen M. Kenton @ 2003-09-06 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lethal, linux-fbdev-devel, jsimmons, geert
Any reason that imsttfb_load_cursor_image and imstt_set_cursor
can not be under the same #if 0 as imsttfb_cursor which used to call them?
It gets rid of a couple of defined but not used warnings in 2.6.0-test4
For that matter, is the #if 0 being kept for a particular reason?
Untested patch below
smk
--- drivers/video/imsttfb.c.ori 2003-09-05 22:34:18.000000000 -0500
+++ drivers/video/imsttfb.c 2003-09-05 22:35:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@
while(read_reg_le32(par->dc_regs, SSTATUS) & 0x40);
}
+#if 0
static int
imsttfb_load_cursor_image(struct imstt_par *par, int width, int height, __u8 fgc)
{
@@ -1191,7 +1192,6 @@
}
}
-#if 0
static int
imsttfb_cursor(struct fb_info *info, struct fb_cursor *cursor)
{
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-09-06 4:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-06 4:15 imsttfb warnings in 2.6.0-test4 Stephen M. Kenton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).