From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Zielinski Subject: Re: Restoring Screen when coming back from KD_GRAPHICS Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 20:22:51 -0500 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3FEA3BEB.2060608@undead.cc> References: <3FC4603C.2000702@undead.cc> <1072254378.739.65.camel@gaston> <3FEA0E0D.3030001@undead.cc> <1072306057.15476.19.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AZKDU-00056v-Ba for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:23:08 -0800 Received: from ns2.undead.cc ([216.126.84.18] helo=mail.undead.cc) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AZKDT-0002Rp-UW for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:23:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1072306057.15476.19.camel@gaston> Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Linux Fbdev development list , James Simmons Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >I don't think we need to "save" anything, there is no way I want any >knowledge of fbcon-specific stuff to go back into fbdev's, it was >hard enough to split these properly (that's a good thing James did). > > I was using "save" as in "don't overwrite". The fb_var_screeninfo and fb_cmap structures are the two main ones. If we have seperate ones for each vt and one for when a graphics app then the contents of each is "saved" and can be restored by fbcon very easily. But if a fbdev can't recreate it's state from the information that fbcon provides (var, cmap, etc) because it has some internal driver or hw state info then there needs to be a way for fbcon to tell the fbdev "put your internal state in this buffer" so it can be remembered when things get restored later. That way the fbdev doesn't have to worry about any of the high level stuff. It just gets the contents of that buffer back when things get restored. Fbcon can ask the driver on startup as to how many bytes of buffer space does it need for it's save area and if the fbdev doesn't need any (it can totally restore it's state using the normal set_var mechanism) it can just say zero. >I think we just need to instruct the fbdev to restore it's mode via >a set_var with an activate flag FB_ACTIVATE_FORCE, that bypass any >test inside the driver about the mode changing from the current info-var, >that is basically forcing it to re-apply it's current var. Most drivers >will also reset the accel engine properly if any when doing so. > > Can all the fbdevs restore everything with just that information? If so then we don't have to worry about the internal state save buffer stuff above. John ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click