linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
To: Kendall Bennett <KendallB@scitechsoft.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	penguinppc-team@lists.penguinppc.org,
	linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: Generic VESA framebuffer driver and Video card BOOT?
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:11:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <417F8269.2070307@grupopie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417E9E3D.573.3C0CDE1A@localhost>

Kendall Bennett wrote:
> Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com> wrote:
> .....
>>If the same treatment is applied to ops2.c and prim_ops.c, I
>>believe it would be possible to have a functional emulator for
>>about 32kb of kernel code size, which seems pretty reasonable to
>>me and could solve a lot of problems. 
> 
> 
> Wow, that is great!

Thanks :)

> 
>>The decrease in source code size also helps maintenance, since
>>there is not so much repeated code has it was before. 
>>
>>Of course, these changes are optimizing the emulator for code
>>size, and not execution speed. I haven't done any benchmarks to
>>see if there is a noticeable difference in speed. 
> 
> 
> Did you get the latest code? I have been sick with the flu and I think I 
> forgot to send you the latest code to play with. We should get you set up 
> so you can merge your changes into our tree and then we can update the 
> one in the X.org tree as well (Egbert Eich usually does that from our 
> tree).

No, I didn't get the latest source (you did disapear for a while :) ).

I started to work on the old source because:

  A - I really wanted to know if this could be done and what kind of 
improvements could be expected, even if the actual changes were thrown 
away in the end

  B - you said that only small bug fixes were made since this version, 
so I probably could diff the source I started from against the latest 
and do the same fixes to my latest source.

One other thing, is there a simple way to test the emulator? I've been 
careful with the changes I did not to change the resulting behaviour of 
the emulator, but I can not _absolutely_ sure that I didn't break 
anything. It would be very good to try the emulator in a controlled 
environment.

Anyway, I think I'll have some more time tonight, so probably tomorrow 
I'll have more information about the final code size.

-- 
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-27 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-14 19:02 Generic VESA framebuffer driver and Video card BOOT? Kendall Bennett
2004-10-14 19:59 ` Zachary Smith
2004-10-15 23:36   ` Ian Romanick
2004-10-14 20:48 ` Zachary Smith
2004-10-15 18:05   ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15 18:55     ` Zachary Smith
2004-10-15 19:18       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-15 22:22       ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15  0:27 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Antonino A. Daplas
2004-10-15 18:36   ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15 21:51     ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-10-15 23:20       ` Jon Smirl
2004-10-15 23:51         ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15 23:58           ` Jon Smirl
2004-10-19 21:15           ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-16  1:50         ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-10-16  2:03           ` Jon Smirl
2004-10-18 19:34             ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-18 20:34               ` Richard Smith
2004-10-18 20:47                 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Kendall Bennett
2004-10-18 21:04                   ` Richard Smith
2004-10-18 21:16                 ` Jon Smirl
2004-10-18 22:34                   ` Richard Smith
2004-10-18 23:28                     ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Jon Smirl
2004-10-19  0:18                       ` Richard Smith
2004-10-19  0:55                     ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Kendall Bennett
2004-10-19  1:39                       ` Richard Smith
2004-10-19 17:54                         ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-19 21:48                       ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Pavel Machek
2004-10-20 17:01                         ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-20 19:08                           ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Pavel Machek
2004-10-21 19:36                             ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-19 21:42                   ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Pavel Machek
2004-10-15 12:05 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-10-15 12:38   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-15 12:45     ` Alan Cox
2004-10-19 21:54       ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-15 13:13     ` Gerd Knorr
2004-10-17 12:07       ` Martin Waitz
2004-10-18  8:36         ` Gerd Knorr
2004-10-18 11:39           ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Martin Waitz
2004-10-18 12:10             ` Gerd Knorr
2004-10-18 20:21               ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Helge Hafting
2004-10-18 20:42                 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-10-19 16:57                   ` Martin Waitz
2004-10-15 18:29     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2004-10-16  9:01       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-15 18:36   ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15 13:48 ` Helge Hafting
2004-10-15 18:36   ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15 21:44     ` Helge Hafting
2004-10-15 22:12       ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-16  0:41         ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Antonino A. Daplas
2004-10-26 11:14           ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-27  1:58             ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-27 11:11               ` Paulo Marques [this message]
2004-10-27 19:52                 ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-15 21:51     ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-10-16 17:44 ` Jon Smirl
2004-10-18 19:34   ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-19 21:00 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-19 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-20 17:01   ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-20 17:31     ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Pavel Machek
2004-10-20 18:44       ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-20 19:10         ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Pavel Machek
2004-10-21 19:36           ` Kendall Bennett
2004-10-21 20:47             ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Richard Smith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-21 22:28 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-10-21 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-21 23:10 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-10-21 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-21 23:44 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-10-22 12:57 ` Stefan Dösinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=417F8269.2070307@grupopie.com \
    --to=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=KendallB@scitechsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=penguinppc-team@lists.penguinppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).