Re: [PATCH] Split multiple assignments to individual lines.

[Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>]

On 8/22/22 17:41, Christopher Carbone wrote:
> Adhere to Linux kernel coding style.
> 
> Reported by checkpatch:
> 
> CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Carbone <chris.m.carbone@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> index dbd1159a2ef0..a0f8ae359248 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,8 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
>   
>   	ret = lynxfb_set_color_offsets(info);
>   
> -	var->height = var->width = -1;
> +	var->width = -1;
> +	var->height = var->width;
>   	var->accel_flags = 0;/*FB_ACCELF_TEXT;*/
>   
>   	if (ret) {
> @@ -498,7 +499,8 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_check_var(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   
> -	var->height = var->width = -1;
> +	var->width = -1;
> +	var->height = var->width;
>   	var->accel_flags = 0;/* FB_ACCELF_TEXT; */
>   
>   	/* check if current fb's video memory big enough to hold the onscreen*/
> @@ -723,7 +725,8 @@ static int lynxfb_set_fbinfo(struct fb_info *info, int index)
>   		0x800f0 + (int)crtc->channel * 0x140;
>   
>   	pr_info("crtc->cursor.mmio = %p\n", crtc->cursor.mmio);
> -	crtc->cursor.max_h = crtc->cursor.max_w = 64;
> +	crtc->cursor.max_w = 64;
> +	crtc->cursor.max_h = crtc->cursor.max_w;
>   	crtc->cursor.size = crtc->cursor.max_h * crtc->cursor.max_w * 2 / 8;
>   	crtc->cursor.vstart = sm750_dev->pvMem + crtc->cursor.offset;
>   
> @@ -1027,7 +1030,8 @@ static int lynxfb_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>   	if (!sm750_dev)
>   		return err;
>   
> -	sm750_dev->fbinfo[0] = sm750_dev->fbinfo[1] = NULL;
> +	sm750_dev->fbinfo[1] = NULL;
> +	sm750_dev->fbinfo[0] = sm750_dev->fbinfo[1];
>   	sm750_dev->devid = pdev->device;
>   	sm750_dev->revid = pdev->revision;
>   	sm750_dev->pdev = pdev;


Hi,

the subsystem and the device is missing in the Subject.

I propose you look into https://kernelnewbies.org/FirstKernelPatch to 
read about the Subject.

I personally prefer more this:

 > +	sm750_dev->fbinfo[1] = NULL;
 > +	sm750_dev->fbinfo[0] = NULL;

That gives a better overview.

Thanks for your support.

Bye Philipp