From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jaya Kumar" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fbdev: Make deferred I/O work as advertized Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:01:16 -0500 Message-ID: <45a44e480802260701o7c616e3bjd5f86f4143be791b@mail.gmail.com> References: <87tzjx6vj3.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <87k5kt6vd3.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <45a44e480802260611l5a8d0bc9k9cc967bc73b88fac@mail.gmail.com> <871w6z6ajs.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <871w6z6ajs.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Markus Armbruster Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, adaplas@pol.net, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > What about pushing the fb_defio fixes independently of any new > fb_defio users? If fb_defio was worth merging into Linus's tree, it > should be worth fixing there, whether new users are in shape already > or not. I think that Andrew's message is saying that there may be a race condition in the defio patch itself as opposed to the defio user patch. If there is no race condition or other problems, then I think it would make sense to merge the defio patch independent of metronomefb or other new patches that use defio. Thanks, jaya