From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jaya Kumar" Subject: Re: [RFC 2.6.27 1/1] gpiolib: add support for batch set of pins Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:18:27 -0500 Message-ID: <45a44e480811260118v440716bbqa8d37c8b696c148a@mail.gmail.com> References: <12276535632759-git-send-email-jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com> <492D125D.5010607@teltonika.lt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <492D125D.5010607@teltonika.lt> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Paulius Zaleckas Cc: David Brownell , David Brownell , Sam Ravnborg , Eric Miao , Haavard Skinnemoen , Philipp Zabel , Russell King , Ben Gardner , Greg KH , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Paulius Zaleckas wrote: > Jaya Kumar wrote: >> * @to_irq: optional hook supporting non-static gpio_to_irq() mappings; >> * implementation may not sleep >> * @dbg_show: optional routine to show contents in debugfs; default code >> @@ -84,6 +86,9 @@ struct gpio_chip { >> unsigned offset, int value); >> void (*set)(struct gpio_chip *chip, >> unsigned offset, int value); >> + void (*set_bus)(struct gpio_chip *chip, >> + unsigned offset, int values, > > I think values should be unsigned > Okay, can do but it is unusual no? since set uses int value, i figured set_bus should be similar right? Thanks, jaya