From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Tobias Schandinat Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13976] New: viafb + vmalloc Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:24:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4A84849A.3000807@gmx.de> References: <20090813123622.624240c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sfi-mx-4.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.124] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by 235xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mbhmr-0004ch-QG for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:24:41 +0000 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by 1b2kzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) id 1Mbhml-0000Le-FO for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:24:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20090813123622.624240c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Joseph Chan , Scott Fang , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, sungeneral@gmail.com Hi, excuse me to interfere although I don't know the memory subsystem/functions very well. Andrew Morton schrieb: > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > bugzilla web interface). > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:22:41 GMT > bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13976 >> >> Summary: viafb + vmalloc >> Product: Drivers >> Version: 2.5 >> Kernel Version: 2.6.30.4 >> Platform: All >> OS/Version: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: Video(Other) >> AssignedTo: drivers_video-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org >> ReportedBy: sungeneral@gmail.com >> Regression: No > > OK, this is bad. > >> #modprobe viafb >> Jun 21 05:17:53 mini2133 [ 50.504357] VIA Graphics Intergration Chipset >> framebuffer 2.4 initializing >> Jun 21 05:17:53 mini2133 [ 50.583434] vmap allocation for size 268439552 >> failed: use vmalloc= to increase size. >> Jun 21 05:17:53 mini2133 [ 50.583443] ioremap failed >> >> if add parametr vmalloc=260M to kernel >> >> #modprobe viafb >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.692317] VIA Graphics Intergration Chipset >> framebuffer 2.4 initializing >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.772731] vmap allocation for size 16781312 >> failed: use vmalloc= to increase size. >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.772750] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL >> pointer dereference at 00000004 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.772921] IP: [] >> viafb_init_2d_engine+0x16/0x583 [viafb] >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] *pde = 00000000 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] last sysfs file: >> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0f.0/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/uevent >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Modules linked in: viafb(+) >> i2c_algo_bit via drm via_agp agpgart >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Pid: 4084, comm: modprobe Not tainted >> (2.6.30-gentoo-r4 #13) >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] EIP: 0060:[] EFLAGS: 00010202 >> CPU: 0 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] EIP is at >> viafb_init_2d_engine+0x16/0x583 [viafb] >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] EAX: 00000004 EBX: ed8a5280 ECX: >> c256d700 EDX: 00000000 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] ESI: fffffffc EDI: 00000000 EBP: >> ed8b3f18 ESP: ed8b3f08 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 >> SS: 0068 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Process modprobe (pid: 4084, >> ti=ed8b2000 task=ee7da220 task.ti=ed8b2000) >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Stack: >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] 00000000 ed8a5280 fffffffc 00000000 >> ed8b3f40 ef656505 00000000 ed8b3f40 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] c1062132 00000000 00000000 ef6535e4 >> fffffffc 00000000 ed8b3f9c c1001137 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] ef656000 00000000 ef6535e4 00000001 >> 00000000 c15dec24 00000000 c15dec34 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Call Trace: >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? viafb_init+0x505/0xd2c >> [viafb] >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? >> marker_update_probe_range+0x1cf/0x1de >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? >> do_one_initcall+0x4a/0x10c >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? viafb_init+0x0/0xd2c >> [viafb] >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? >> __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x4c >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? >> sys_init_module+0x87/0x18b >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] [] ? >> sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] Code: ff ff 03 00 89 42 44 a1 44 38 65 >> ef 81 40 38 00 20 04 00 5d c3 55 31 d2 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 04 a1 44 38 65 ef >> 8b 40 1c 83 c0 04 <89> 10 a1 44 38 65 ef 8b 40 1c 83 c0 08 89 10 a1 44 38 65 ef >> 8b >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] EIP: [] >> viafb_init_2d_engine+0x16/0x583 [viafb] SS:ESP 0068:ed8b3f08 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.773005] CR2: 0000000000000004 >> Jun 21 05:11:17 mini2133 [ 60.779905] ---[ end trace c390d80983a29e06 ]--- >> >> ps: viafb build as a module >> > > a) The driver appears to be ioremapping more virtual address space > than the machine can provide. > > Is that expected? I don't know. Is the video memory size detection of (I think) 256 MB correct? What is the graphic chip? (CLE266, CN400, CN700, KM400, CX700 or VX800?) > b) When ioremap_nocache() failed, the driver went and crashed the > machine. I don't see how this can happen - via_pci_probe() seems to > handle this correctly. > > It should return -ENOMEM rather than -1, but that's minor. If an ioremap_nocache() can cause this, I don't see why it can't be the later one: viaparinfo->io_virt = ioremap_nocache() As far as I know this is only used for acceleration so a quick test can be done with viafb_accel=0 module parameter. Regards, Florian Tobias Schandinat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july