From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fb_write unaligned writes
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:11:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C93AF34.4030308@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009092338.59880.james@albanarts.com>
Hi,
James Hogan schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a problem in fb_write (drivers/video/fbmem.c) which doesn't make
> any effort to avoid unaligned writes. It copies up to a page at a time from
> userspace into a buffer, then fb_writel's as much as possible from the buffer
> into the framebuffer, then fb_writeb's any remaining bytes. However on
> architectures which don't perform unaligned writes this can cause a bus error
> or silently fail when it tries to fb_writel to an unaligned framebuffer
> position.
>
> My question is how best should this be fixed? I know I could avoid writing
> more than 3 bytes to an unaligned framebuffer offset, but the standard write
> syscall should be able to handle this, and Documentation/unaligned-memory-
> access.txt makes it clear that unaligned accesses are to be avoided and with
> good reason.
>
> Is it possible to just copy_from_user straight into the framebuffer, or should
> I define an fb_memcpy to go with the other definitions around line 925 of
> include/linux/fb.h, or something else?
Just doing copy_from_user straight into the framebuffer sounds like the right
thing to me but my knowledge is limited to x86. As far as I can see this would
make the functions (doing the same for fb_read can't hurt, can it?) in fbmem.c
very similar to those in fb_sys_fops.c. Most users of the later functions can be
easily eliminated as simply removing ".fb_{read,write} = fb_sys_{read,write}" is
sufficient, only xen-fbfront.c looks more difficult as it also refreshes the
screen so I'd suggest the following:
Merging fb_sys_fops.c in fbmem.c, adjusting the fb_{read,write} functions to use
the the fb_sys_{read,write} copying and removing all trivial uses of
fb_sys_{read,write}. As far as I can see this should solve your problem and
would be a cleanup at the same time.
But it would be good if someone who knows other archs (especially sparc as they
currently seem to perform some assembler that I can't decipher) could comment on
this topic.
Thanks,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 22:38 fb_write unaligned writes James Hogan
2010-09-17 18:11 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat [this message]
2010-09-17 23:57 ` [PATCH] fbmem: Fix fb_read, fb_write unaligned accesses James Hogan
2010-09-18 0:15 ` David Miller
2010-09-18 0:23 ` James Hogan
2010-09-18 3:17 ` David Miller
2010-09-20 19:27 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2010-09-21 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-22 0:00 ` James Hogan
2010-09-18 0:11 ` fb_write unaligned writes James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C93AF34.4030308@gmx.de \
--to=florianschandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).