linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fb_write unaligned writes
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:11:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C93AF34.4030308@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009092338.59880.james@albanarts.com>

Hi,

James Hogan schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> I came across a problem in fb_write (drivers/video/fbmem.c) which doesn't make 
> any effort to avoid unaligned writes. It copies up to a page at a time from 
> userspace into a buffer, then fb_writel's as much as possible from the buffer 
> into the framebuffer, then fb_writeb's any remaining bytes. However on 
> architectures which don't perform unaligned writes this can cause a bus error 
> or silently fail when it tries to fb_writel to an unaligned framebuffer 
> position.
> 
> My question is how best should this be fixed? I know I could avoid writing 
> more than 3 bytes to an unaligned framebuffer offset, but the standard write 
> syscall should be able to handle this, and Documentation/unaligned-memory-
> access.txt makes it clear that unaligned accesses are to be avoided and with 
> good reason.
> 
> Is it possible to just copy_from_user straight into the framebuffer, or should 
> I define an fb_memcpy to go with the other definitions around line 925 of 
> include/linux/fb.h, or something else?

Just doing copy_from_user straight into the framebuffer sounds like the right 
thing to me but my knowledge is limited to x86. As far as I can see this would 
make the functions (doing the same for fb_read can't hurt, can it?) in fbmem.c 
very similar to those in fb_sys_fops.c. Most users of the later functions can be 
easily eliminated as simply removing ".fb_{read,write} = fb_sys_{read,write}" is 
sufficient, only xen-fbfront.c looks more difficult as it also refreshes the 
screen so I'd suggest the following:
Merging fb_sys_fops.c in fbmem.c, adjusting the fb_{read,write} functions to use 
the the fb_sys_{read,write} copying and removing all trivial uses of 
fb_sys_{read,write}. As far as I can see this should solve your problem and 
would be a cleanup at the same time.
But it would be good if someone who knows other archs (especially sparc as they 
currently seem to perform some assembler that I can't decipher) could comment on 
this topic.


Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-17 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-09 22:38 fb_write unaligned writes James Hogan
2010-09-17 18:11 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat [this message]
2010-09-17 23:57 ` [PATCH] fbmem: Fix fb_read, fb_write unaligned accesses James Hogan
2010-09-18  0:15   ` David Miller
2010-09-18  0:23   ` James Hogan
2010-09-18  3:17     ` David Miller
2010-09-20 19:27     ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2010-09-21 23:19     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-22  0:00       ` James Hogan
2010-09-18  0:11 ` fb_write unaligned writes James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C93AF34.4030308@gmx.de \
    --to=florianschandinat@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).