From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
To: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bernie Thompson <bernie@plugable.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, RFC] Make struct fb_info ref-counted with kref
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:47:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C963E99.9080207@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100919172833.14bf291e@neptune.home>
Hi,
Bruno Prémont schrieb:
> For USB-attached (or other hot-(un)pluggable) framebuffers the current
> fbdev infrastructure is not very helpful. Each such driver currently
> needs to perform the ref-counting on its own in .fbops.fb_open and
> .fbops.fb_release callbacks.
I agree. This is a great idea even for non-hot-(un)pluggable framebuffers.
> This patch moves the ref-counting in fbdev infrastructure.
> (drivers have not been adjusted, all those releasing fb_info in
> .fbops.fb_destroy will not work -- patch for those will follow
> later on, all the others will continue to work fine)
>
> API-wise the following changes are done:
> - num_registered_fb and registered_fb variables are no more exported.
> New functions fb_get_registered() and fb_is_registered() replace
> them.
> The only know user of those was fbcon, thus the large diff on fbcon.c
>
> Note: the accesses to registered_fb and num_registered_fb look racy
> as there was not protection at all around them, potentially letting
> register_framebuffer() register two framebuffers on the same minor
> concurrently, fbcon access should have been safe by combination of
> its use of console_semaphore and reaction to events.
> In this patch I combined most of fbcon's accesses to registered_fb
> and num_registered_fb into fb_is_registered(), though I'm not sure
> if the num-check optimization is worth to keep or its check should
> be put into a separate function.
>
> - framebuffer_release() is mapped to fb_put() but will go away
> when converting drivers
>
> Reference count for fb_info can be increased with fb_get(fb_info) and
> later released with fb_put(fb_info).
>
>
> If you have concerns regarding the API changes, please let me know.
Uhm, I'm not really happy with what we count. With the old method you mentioned
we ref-counted framebuffer users, after your patch it's more counting users +
uses. This might be okay as we usually are interested whether the ref_count is 0
or not but it doesn't look right if we modify the refcount during nearly every
framebuffer operation. Wouldn't it be sufficient to do the refcounting in
fb_open & fb_release operation + in fbcon where open&release are done?
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> index 0a08f13..be5f342 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct fb_info *framebuffer_alloc(size_t size, struct device *dev)
> info->par = p + fb_info_size;
>
> info->device = dev;
> + kref_init(&info->refcount);
As far as I know there exist framebuffer drivers which do not call
framebuffer_alloc but contain their own fb_info. I guess these would be broken
as well.
Thanks,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-19 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-19 15:28 [Patch, RFC] Make struct fb_info ref-counted with kref Bruno Prémont
2010-09-19 16:47 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat [this message]
2010-09-19 17:02 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-20 19:05 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2010-09-20 19:32 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-20 20:08 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2010-09-20 20:36 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-20 22:28 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2010-09-21 5:56 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-21 6:39 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2010-09-21 7:02 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-22 17:31 ` James Simmons
2010-09-22 18:39 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-22 19:14 ` James Simmons
2010-09-22 19:35 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-20 19:34 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-09-20 20:14 ` Bruno Prémont
2010-09-20 20:27 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-09-21 10:44 ` Michel Dänzer
2010-09-20 8:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C963E99.9080207@gmx.de \
--to=florianschandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=bernie@plugable.com \
--cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).