From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Yannick Heneault <yheneaul@matrox.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
open@linux-sh.org,
"\"list@linux-sh.org\"@zmta03.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com:FRAMEBUFFER
LAYER" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] video: remove pointless comments in drivers/video/console/vgacon.c
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:19:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D36828C.5030601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110119061551.GB12205@linux-sh.org>
于 2011年01月19日 14:15, Paul Mundt 写道:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:08:22PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> ??? 2011???01???19??? 14:02, Paul Mundt ??????:
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:00:02PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>>> Now vgacon_scrollback_startup() uses slab, not bootmem,
>>>> so that comment is obsolete, the rest are useless.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong<amwang@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>> If you're going to do this then at least follow through and do the rest
>>> of it. The comment is no longer applicable, but then neither is the
>>> __init_refok annotation. Killing off the comment explaining why something
>>> is (or was there) without killing off the thing that is referenced by the
>>> comment is not terribly productive.
>>
>> Isn't __init_refok already a clear sign of "silence modpost"?
>> Why need to comment it again?
>
> __init_refok was to silence what was presumably an alloc_bootmem()
> reference at the time that the slab allocations were not early enough to
> satisfy the allocation, necessitating the use of bootmem. Since kmalloc
> and friends became usable early enough and the bootmem allocation has
> subsequently been dropped, there's no longer any need for the annotation.
>
> ie, alloc_bootmem() itself is __init while vgacon_scrollback_startup() is
> not, hence the modpost complaint.
Ah, I see, will remove '__init_refok' as well.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 6:00 [Patch] video: remove pointless comments in drivers/video/console/vgacon.c Amerigo Wang
2011-01-19 6:02 ` Paul Mundt
[not found] ` <4D367FD6.1010006@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110119061551.GB12205@linux-sh.org>
2011-01-19 6:19 ` Cong Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D36828C.5030601@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=open@linux-sh.org \
--cc=yheneaul@matrox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).