From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
"Clark, Rob" <rob@ti.com>, Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:47:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E723A20.2040002@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110915181802.69ef0d56@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Hi Alan,
On 09/15/2011 05:18 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> is and we could use it. Such attitude is not helpful and as I don't see any
>> serious intention of the DRM guys to cooperate I think those subsystems are more
>> likely to diverge. At least I'll never accept any change to the fb
>> infrastructure that requires DRM.
>
> There are aspects of the fb code that want changing for DRM (and indeed
> modern hardware) but which won't break for other stuff. Given the move to
> using main memory for video and the need for the OS to do buffer
> management for framebuffers I suspect a move to DRM is pretty much
> inevitable, along with having to fix the fb layer to cope with
> discontiguous framebuffers.
What is your problem with discontigous framebuffers? (I assume discontigous
refers to the pages the framebuffer is composed of)
Sounds to me like you should implement your own fb_mmap and either map it
contigous to screen_base or implement your own fb_read/write.
In theory you could even have each pixel at a completely different memory
location although some userspace wouldn't be happy when it could no longer mmap
the framebuffer.
Best regards,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-15 12:07 Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-15 14:59 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-15 15:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-15 15:50 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-15 17:05 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-17 21:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-15 17:12 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-15 17:18 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-15 17:47 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat [this message]
2011-09-15 19:05 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-15 19:46 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-15 21:31 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-15 17:52 ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-15 17:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-09-15 18:04 ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-15 18:39 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-15 18:58 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-15 19:18 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
[not found] ` <4E724F93.1050203-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-15 19:28 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-15 19:45 ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-17 14:44 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-09-17 15:16 ` Rob Clark
2011-09-17 16:11 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-17 16:47 ` Dave Airlie
2011-09-17 18:15 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-17 18:23 ` Dave Airlie
2011-09-17 19:06 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-17 19:25 ` Corbin Simpson
2011-09-17 21:25 ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-17 20:25 ` Alan Cox
2011-10-31 20:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-09-17 16:50 ` Rob Clark
2011-09-16 4:53 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-17 23:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-18 16:14 ` Rob Clark
2011-09-18 21:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <201109180112.15896.laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-18 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-19 0:09 ` Rob Clark
2011-09-20 23:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-15 18:12 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-15 17:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-15 18:32 ` Rob Clark
2011-09-16 0:55 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-16 6:38 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-16 14:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-09-16 16:53 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-19 6:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-19 6:53 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-19 7:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-20 8:29 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2011-09-20 15:55 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-20 21:20 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2011-09-21 6:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-21 18:07 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2011-09-15 15:03 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-09-21 13:26 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E723A20.2040002@gmx.de \
--to=florianschandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).