From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Archit Taneja <a0393947@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OMAPDSS: HACK: Ensure DSS clock domain gets out of idle when HDMI is enabled
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:41:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3A809E.3070508@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3A61EF.4030803@ti.com>
On 2/14/2012 2:30 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 14 February 2012 06:45 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:58 +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>>> Hi Tomi,
>>
>>>> Benoit, do you think we'll get the MODULEMODE mess cleaned up in the
>>>> hwmod/clk framework at some point, and the drivers could do without
>>>> these kinds of hacks? =)
>>>
>>> The best way to fix that for my point of view is to go to device tree
>>> or/and to consider the DSS as the parent of all the DSS modules.
>>> pm_runtime will then always ensure that the parent is enabled before any
>>> of the child are used.
>>
>> Ah, right. Sounds fine to me.
>>
>> But is that a proper "fix"? Are we sure the MODULEMODE will then always
>> be handled correctly? Isn't the core problem still there, it just
>> doesn't happen with the setup anymore?
>>
>> I mean, if we have these special requirements regarding MODULEMODE, and
>> the code doesn't really know about it, would it get broken easily with
>> restructuring/changes?
>>
>> And no, I don't have any clear idea why/how it would break, but I have
>> just gotten the impression that the MODULEMODE is not handled quite
>> properly (and so we have these current problems), and having dss_core as
>> the parent of other dss modules doesn't really fix that in any way.
>
> I agree with that.
>
> In the current approach, we have multiple platform devices for DSS, and
> all of them belong to the same clock domain, and the clock domain has
> just one MODULEMODE bit field.
>
> When shutting off a platform device(by calling pm_runtime_put()), hwmod
> enables/disables MODULEMODE without taking into mind that other active
> platform devices may still need it. So, for example, if we have 2
> platform devices, say dss and dispc, and we have code like:
>
> dispc_foo()
> {
> pm_runtime_get(dispc_pdev);
> ...
> ...
> pm_runtime_put(dispc_pdev);
> }
>
> dss_foo()
> {
> pm_runtime_get(dss_pdev);
> ...
> ...
> dispc_foo(); /* MODULEMODE off after this */
> ...
> ...
> pm_runtime_put(dss_pdev);
> }
>
> This will lead to the situation of one platform device disabling
> MODULEMODE even though other platform devices need it.
>
> This may not be resolved in device tree either. We would need to have
> some use count mechanism for these bits, or attach MODULEMODE only to
> one platform device, and don't give others control to enable/disable it.
And this is exactly what the pm_runtime will provide. The fmwk already
handles reference counting.
Moreover the dev->parent will increment the power.child_count and thus
ensure that the parent is always enabled if at least one child is active.
By initializing the dev->parent of each DSS modules to the dss_core, it
will ensure that the power dependency is managed properly.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 6:27 [PATCH v2] OMAPDSS: HACK: Ensure DSS clock domain gets out of idle when HDMI is enabled Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 11:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-14 12:58 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-14 13:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-14 13:42 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 13:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-14 13:57 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 16:02 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-14 16:59 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-14 19:54 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 15:41 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-02-15 12:13 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-15 12:35 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-15 12:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-15 13:04 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-15 19:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-16 8:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-16 10:16 ` Cousson, Benoit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3A809E.3070508@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=a0393947@ti.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).