linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <a0393947@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: DSI: Support command mode interleaving during video mode blanking periods
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 08:26:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB9F958.7080600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337348396.2607.19.camel@deskari>

On Friday 18 May 2012 07:09 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 11:32 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> DSI supports interleaving of command mode packets during the HSA, HFP, HBP and
>> BLLP blanking intervals in a video mode stream. This is useful as a user may
>> want to read or change the configuration of a panel without stopping the video
>> stream.
>>
>> On OMAP DSI, we can queue HS or LP command mode packets in the TX FIFO, and
>> the DSI HW takes care of interleaving this data during the one of the blanking
>> intervals. The DSI HW needs to be programmed with the maximum amount of data
>> that can be interleaved in a particular blanking period. A blanking period
>> cannot be used to send command mode data for it's complete duration, there is
>> some amount of time required for the DSI data and clock lanes to transition
>> to the desired LP or HS state.
>>
>> Based on the state of the lanes at the beginning and end of the blanking period,
>> we have different scenarios, with each scenario having a different value of time
>> required to transition to HS or LP. Refer to the section 'Interleaving Mode' in
>> OMAP TRM for more info on the scenarios and the equations to calculate the time
>> required for HS or LP transitions.
>>
>> We use the scenarios which takes the maximum time for HS or LP transition, this
>> gives us the minimum amount of time that can be used to interleave command mode
>> data. The amount of data that can be sent during this minimum time is calculated
>> for command mode packets both in LP and HS. These are written to the registers
>> DSI_VM_TIMING4 to DSI_VM_TIMING6.
>>
>> The calculations don't take into account the time required of transmitting BTA
>> when doing a DSI read, or verifying if a DSI write went through correctly. Until
>> these latencies aren't considered, the behaviour of DSI is unpredictable when
>> a BTA is interleaved during a blanking period. Enhancement of these calculations
>> is a TODO item.
>
> The code in dsi_config_cmd_mode_interleaving() looks a bit long and
> confusing, but I don't think it's trivial to simplify it. There's just
> so many variables to consider.

There is a little optimisation done in the code to not calculate the 
interleaving parameter for a blanking period which is not used for 
interleaving. Checks like below are done for that:

	if(!hsa_blanking_mode) {
		...
	}

	if (!hfp_blanking_mode) {
		...
	}

	...

We could remove this, as the computation is just done once and there 
seems to be no side effects to write interleaving parameters for a 
blanking period not used for interleaving. But it won't make much 
function much simpler.

>
> In the future I think we should store the DSI configurations into
> memory, so that we don't need to parse the hardware registers to find
> out things like DSI timings.

Yes, I'll do this clean up sometime soon.

Archit

      reply	other threads:[~2012-05-21  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-15  6:14 [PATCH] OMAPDSS: DSI: Support command mode interleaving during video mode blanking periods Archit Taneja
2012-05-18 13:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-05-21  8:26   ` Archit Taneja [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB9F958.7080600@ti.com \
    --to=a0393947@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).