linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] OMAPDSS: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 05:31:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEA97DC.4070902@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340770798.1972.4.camel@lappyti>

On Wednesday 27 June 2012 09:49 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 17:47 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> On 20120625-16:14, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> A question about clk_prepare/unprepare, not directly related: let's say
>>> I have a driver for some HW block. The driver doesn't use clk functions,
>>> but uses runtime PM. The driver also sets pm_runtime_irq_safe().
>>>
>>> Now, the driver can call pm_runtime_get_sync() in an atomic context, and
>>> this would lead to the underlying framework (hwmod, omap_device, I don't
>>> know who =) enabling the func clock for that HW. But this would happen
>>> in atomic context, so the underlying framework can't use clk_prepare.
>>>
>>> How does the underlying framework handle that case? (sorry if that's a
>>> stupid question =).
>>>
>>
>> I think it's a good question!
>>
>> If we're going to call clk_prepare_enable from within a runtime pm
>> callback then I think we'll need to check if _irq_safe() is set and
>> conditionally call only clk_enable in such a case.
>>
>> I'm not a runtime pm expert, but if the driver owns the responsibility
>> of calling pm_runtime_irq_safe then the driver has the proper context
>> to know that it should call clk_prepare BEFORE calling
>> pm_runtime_get_sync.
>
> That's not quite what I meant. If it's the driver that does clk_enable,
> be it in runtime PM callback or not, it's driver's responsibility.
>
> But some clocks are not handled by the driver, but the hwmod/omap_device
> framework. Mainly I think this is for the functional and interface
> clocks. The driver has no visibility to those, they are implicitly
> enabled via pm_runtime_get.

yes, thats the tricky part on how would hwmod/omap_device know if the
driver would use runtime pm within atomic context or non-atomic context.
The driver does inform the runtime pm framework about this by calling a
pm_runtime_irq_safe(), which is then used to set the .irq_safe flag 
telling it to leave the interrupts disabled during callbacks.
This information however does not flow down to hwmod/omap_device in any
way. So the way its currently handled is to do an early prepare of all
hwmod controlled clocks.

I have copied Kevin in case he has any better ideas on how this should
be handled.

>
>   Tomi
>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-27  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1340372890-10091-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
2012-06-22 13:51 ` [PATCH 05/11] OMAPDSS: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-25  6:07   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25  7:11     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-25  7:58       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 11:52         ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-25 13:14           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26  5:12             ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-26  6:55               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26  7:48                 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-27  0:47             ` Mike Turquette
2012-06-27  4:19               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27  5:31                 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-06-25 11:22     ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FEA97DC.4070902@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).