From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:57:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences Message-Id: <502D428F.1010901@wwwdotorg.org> List-Id: References: <1345097337-24170-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1345097337-24170-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <502D3E29.1010501@wwwdotorg.org> <20120816184703.GP15365@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20120816184703.GP15365-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren , linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Anton Vorontsov , Alexandre Courbot , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Woodhouse , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power >> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must >> admit this DT rule kinda sucks. > > Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is > there any reason we can't just change the rule? It'd be rather more > constructive... I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters a lot...