From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:35:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences Message-Id: <502D4B8A.5070509@wwwdotorg.org> List-Id: References: <1345097337-24170-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1345097337-24170-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <502D3E29.1010501@wwwdotorg.org> <20120816184703.GP15365@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <502D428F.1010901@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <502D428F.1010901-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren , linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Anton Vorontsov , Alexandre Courbot , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Woodhouse On 08/16/2012 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >>> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power >>> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must >>> admit this DT rule kinda sucks. >> >> Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is >> there any reason we can't just change the rule? It'd be rather more >> constructive... > > I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters > a lot... In case anyone wants to follow it, it's at: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-August/018502.html