From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, rob@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] OMAPDSS: DPI: always use DSI PLL if available
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:38:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5090D28E.6050703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351613409-21186-13-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 09:40 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> We currently get the decision whether to use PRCM or DSI PLL clock for
> DPI from the board file. This is not a good way to handle it, and it
> won't work with device tree.
>
> This patch changes DPI to always use DSI PLL if it's available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/omap2/dss/dpi.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dpi.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dpi.c
> index 267caf0..32e7dd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dpi.c
> @@ -49,28 +49,30 @@ static struct {
> struct omap_dss_output output;
> } dpi;
>
> -static struct platform_device *dpi_get_dsidev(enum omap_dss_clk_source clk)
> +static struct platform_device *dpi_get_dsidev(enum omap_channel channel)
> {
> - int dsi_module;
> -
> - dsi_module = clk = OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC ? 0 : 1;
> -
> - return dsi_get_dsidev_from_id(dsi_module);
> + switch (channel) {
> + case OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD:
> + return dsi_get_dsidev_from_id(0);
> + case OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD2:
> + return dsi_get_dsidev_from_id(1);
> + default:
> + return NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> -static bool dpi_use_dsi_pll(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
> +static enum omap_dss_clk_source dpi_get_alt_clk_src(enum omap_channel channel)
> {
> - if (dssdev->clocks.dispc.dispc_fclk_src =
> - OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC ||
> - dssdev->clocks.dispc.dispc_fclk_src =
> - OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI2_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC ||
> - dssdev->clocks.dispc.channel.lcd_clk_src =
> - OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC ||
> - dssdev->clocks.dispc.channel.lcd_clk_src =
> - OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI2_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC)
> - return true;
> - else
> - return false;
> + switch (channel) {
> + case OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD:
> + return OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC;
> + case OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD2:
> + return OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI2_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC;
> + default:
> + /* this shouldn't happen */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_FCK;
> + }
> }
>
> static int dpi_set_dsi_clk(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> @@ -92,7 +94,7 @@ static int dpi_set_dsi_clk(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> return r;
>
> dss_select_lcd_clk_source(mgr->id,
> - dssdev->clocks.dispc.channel.lcd_clk_src);
> + dpi_get_alt_clk_src(mgr->id));
>
> dpi.mgr_config.clock_info = dispc_cinfo;
>
> @@ -385,6 +387,8 @@ static int __init dpi_verify_dsi_pll(struct platform_device *dsidev)
>
> static int __init dpi_init_display(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
> {
> + struct platform_device *dsidev;
> +
> DSSDBG("init_display\n");
>
> if (dss_has_feature(FEAT_DPI_USES_VDDS_DSI) &&
> @@ -401,17 +405,23 @@ static int __init dpi_init_display(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
> dpi.vdds_dsi_reg = vdds_dsi;
> }
>
> - if (dpi_use_dsi_pll(dssdev)) {
> - enum omap_dss_clk_source dispc_fclk_src > - dssdev->clocks.dispc.dispc_fclk_src;
> - dpi.dsidev = dpi_get_dsidev(dispc_fclk_src);
> + /*
> + * XXX We shouldn't need dssdev->channel for this. The dsi pll clock
> + * source for DPI is SoC integration detail, not something that should
> + * be configured in the dssdev
> + */
It is SoC integration detail, but it's flexible, it depends on which
manager is connected to DPI output. If it's connected to LCD1, the
source can be DSI1 PLL, if it's LCD2, it's source can be DSI2 PLL, if
it's connected to TV manager, it's source "has to be" HDMI PLL. And
these connections vary based on which OMAP revision we are on. We can
only be certain on OMAP3 that the source for DPI pixel clock can be
either PRCM or DSI PLL.
At the point of probe, we really don't know which manager is the DPI
output connected to. Hence, we sort of use dssdev->channel to make a
guess what manager we connect to in the future.
The right approach would be to figure this out at the time of enable,
where we know which manager the DPI output is connected to. We could
probably move the verification there too.
Archit
> + dsidev = dpi_get_dsidev(dssdev->channel);
>
> - if (dpi_verify_dsi_pll(dpi.dsidev)) {
> - dpi.dsidev = NULL;
> - DSSWARN("DSI PLL not operational\n");
> - }
> + if (dpi_verify_dsi_pll(dsidev)) {
> + dsidev = NULL;
> + DSSWARN("DSI PLL not operational\n");
> }
>
> + if (dsidev)
> + DSSDBG("using DSI PLL for DPI clock\n");
> +
> + dpi.dsidev = dsidev;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 16:09 [PATCH 00/12] OMAPDSS: use DSI PLL clk for DPI Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 01/12] OMAPFB: remove use of extended edid block Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-31 6:22 ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-31 6:23 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 02/12] OMAPFB: improve mode selection from EDID Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 03/12] OMAPDSS: fix DPI & DSI init order Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 04/12] OMAPDSS: fix DSI2 PLL clk names Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] OMAPDSS: DSI: skip odd dividers when pck >= 100MHz Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-31 6:57 ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-31 7:26 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-31 7:44 ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 06/12] OMAPDSS: DSI: workaround for HSDiv problem Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 07/12] OMAPDSS: add dss_calc_clock_rates() back Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 08/12] OMAPDSS: setup default dss fck Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-31 6:43 ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-31 7:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 09/12] OMAPDSS: hide dss_select_dispc_clk_source() Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-31 6:54 ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-31 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 10/12] OMAPDSS: DPI: use dpi.dsidev to see whether to use dsi pll Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 11/12] OMAPDSS: DPI: verify if DSI PLL is operational Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-30 16:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] OMAPDSS: DPI: always use DSI PLL if available Tomi Valkeinen
2012-10-31 7:38 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2012-11-02 10:08 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-02 10:56 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-02 10:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-02 11:21 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-02 11:28 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-02 11:56 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-05 8:55 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-05 14:21 ` Rob Clark
2012-11-06 13:41 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-06 14:40 ` Rob Clark
2012-11-07 10:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-07 14:32 ` Rob Clark
2012-11-07 15:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-07 19:18 ` Rob Clark
2012-11-08 7:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5090D28E.6050703@ti.com \
--to=archit@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).