From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Courbot Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:30:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] drm: tegra: use the Common Display Framework Message-Id: <5108CC25.7080709@nvidia.com> List-Id: References: <1359514939-15653-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1359514939-15653-4-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <5108C298.1000500@gmail.com> <5108C55C.30104@nvidia.com> <20130130072406.GA17128@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> In-Reply-To: <20130130072406.GA17128-RM9K5IK7kjIQXX3q8xo1gnVAuStQJXxyR5q1nwbD4aMs9pC9oP6+/A@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thierry Reding Cc: Mark Zhang , Laurent Pinchart , Stephen Warren , Mark Zhang , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" On 01/30/2013 04:24 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> Could you pick up a somewhat meaningful name? You know, there are too >>> many variables with name "drm/connector/output/encoder"... :) >> >> Well, it's supposed to be abstract. From the CDF point of view it >> could be anything besides a panel. I know this makes it an output of >> an output, but I can't think of anything better right now. > > How about renaming "this" to stream to match with what the output is in > CDF speak. Good idea. > And the output's output is the panel, right? Why not just > call it that? Even if it isn't directly connected to a panel entity but > has indeed a whole pipeline in between, for tegra-drm it is still a > panel. Makes sense indeed. Besides the DT refer it as "panel" already. Thanks, Alex.