From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 20:46:09 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] x86 platform framebuffers
Message-Id: <51FC1A91.3080401@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1375445127-15480-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1375445127-15480-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org

On 08/02/2013 06:05 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I cut down my previous series to no longer include the SimpleDRM driver. If
> anyone is interested, you can find it here:
>   http://lwn.net/Articles/558104/
> I will resend it once these preparation patches are in.
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  - added common x86 formats (reported by hpa) (patch #5)

So I assume this is V3; patch subject doesn't say so:-)

...
> @Stephen: I wasn't sure whether you tested the efi/vesa framebuffer changes,
> too, so I didn't add your tested-by there. And I changed patch #5 so I dropped
> it there, too. Thanks for testing!

Yes, I'm only testing on ARM platforms using simplefb, not any x86
platforms. This latest version seems to work fine, so feel free to
re-apply by tested-by where appropriate.