linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Fix 34xx overlay scaling calculation
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:58:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D3C3EB.6000104@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389444125-5000-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>

Hi,

On Saturday 11 January 2014 06:12 PM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
>
> commit 7faa92339bbb1e6b9a80983b206642517327eb75 OMAPDSS: DISPC: Handle
> synclost errors in OMAP3 introduces limits check to prevent SYNCLOST errors
> on OMAP3. However, it misses the logic found in Nokia kernels that is
> needed to correctly calculate whether 3 tap or 5 tap rescaler to be used as
> well as the logic to fallback to 3 taps if 5 taps clock results in too
> tight horizontal timings. Without that patch "horizontal timing too tight"
> errors are seen when a video with resolution above 640x350 is tried to be
> played. The patch is a forward-ported logic found in Nokia N900 and N9/50
> kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> index 67e413e..9d1aa25 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> @@ -1999,7 +1999,8 @@ static void calc_tiler_rotation_offset(u16 screen_width, u16 width,
>    */
>   static int check_horiz_timing_omap3(unsigned long pclk, unsigned long lclk,
>   		const struct omap_video_timings *t, u16 pos_x,
> -		u16 width, u16 height, u16 out_width, u16 out_height)
> +		u16 width, u16 height, u16 out_width, u16 out_height,
> +		bool five_taps)
>   {
>   	const int ds = DIV_ROUND_UP(height, out_height);
>   	unsigned long nonactive;
> @@ -2019,6 +2020,10 @@ static int check_horiz_timing_omap3(unsigned long pclk, unsigned long lclk,
>   	if (blank <= limits[i])
>   		return -EINVAL;
>
> +	/* FIXME add checks for 3-tap filter once the limitations are known */
> +	if (!five_taps)
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Pixel data should be prepared before visible display point starts.
>   	 * So, atleast DS-2 lines must have already been fetched by DISPC
> @@ -2191,24 +2196,33 @@ static int dispc_ovl_calc_scaling_34xx(unsigned long pclk, unsigned long lclk,
>   	const int maxsinglelinewidth >   			dss_feat_get_param_max(FEAT_PARAM_LINEWIDTH);
>
> +	*five_taps = height > out_height;
> +

We should consider the decimated height when calculating the five taps. 
I suggest the change below:

>   	do {
>   		in_height = DIV_ROUND_UP(height, *decim_y);
>   		in_width = DIV_ROUND_UP(width, *decim_x);
> -		*core_clk = calc_core_clk_five_taps(pclk, mgr_timings,
> -			in_width, in_height, out_width, out_height, color_mode);
> -
> -		error = check_horiz_timing_omap3(pclk, lclk, mgr_timings,
> -				pos_x, in_width, in_height, out_width,
> -				out_height);
>

set "*five_taps = in_height > out_height;" here. The rest of the code 
remains the same.

>   		if (in_width > maxsinglelinewidth)
>   			if (in_height > out_height &&
>   						in_height < out_height * 2)
>   				*five_taps = false;
> -		if (!*five_taps)
> +again:
> +		if (*five_taps)
> +			*core_clk = calc_core_clk_five_taps(pclk, mgr_timings,
> +						in_width, in_height, out_width,
> +						out_height, color_mode);
> +		else
>   			*core_clk = dispc.feat->calc_core_clk(pclk, in_width,
> -					in_height, out_width, out_height,
> -					mem_to_mem);
> +				in_height, out_width, out_height,
> +				mem_to_mem);
> +
> +		error = check_horiz_timing_omap3(pclk, lclk, mgr_timings,
> +				pos_x, in_width, in_height, out_width,
> +				out_height, *five_taps);
> +		if (error && *five_taps) {
> +			*five_taps = false;
> +			goto again;
> +		}
>
>   		error = (error || in_width > maxsinglelinewidth * 2 ||
>   			(in_width > maxsinglelinewidth && *five_taps) ||
> @@ -2226,7 +2240,7 @@ static int dispc_ovl_calc_scaling_34xx(unsigned long pclk, unsigned long lclk,
>   	} while (*decim_x <= *x_predecim && *decim_y <= *y_predecim && error);
>
>   	if (check_horiz_timing_omap3(pclk, lclk, mgr_timings, pos_x, width,
> -				height, out_width, out_height)){
> +				height, out_width, out_height, *five_taps)) {
>   			DSSERR("horizontal timing too tight\n");
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>

Thanks,
Archit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-11 12:42 [PATCH] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Fix 34xx overlay scaling calculation Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-13  9:43 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-13 10:58 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2014-01-13 16:33   ` [PATCH v2] " Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-14  8:11     ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D3C3EB.6000104@ti.com \
    --to=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=freemangordon@abv.bg \
    --cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).