linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] video: clps711x: Add new Cirrus Logic CLPS711X framebuffer driver
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 10:14:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536B5910.1060403@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397285583-15187-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2011 bytes --]

On 08/05/14 11:27, Alexander Shiyan wrote:

>>> At this time the driver has three user.
>>> Only one of them should theoretically work.
>>> clps711x-autcpu12 should not work in the absence of memblock_reserve().
>>> clps711x-p720t should not work due to physical address limitation as i
>>> noticed before. Board means to use SRAM instead of SDRAM.
>>> Only clps711x-edb7211 should work fine (in theory).
>>> Is this a good reason to replace the driver? I think yes.
>>
>> Ok, if the situation is that bad, maybe we can just switch to the new
>> driver. Have you verified that those boards do not work from anyone? Or
>> asked someone to test the new driver with those boards?
> 
> I'm not familiar with other users of this platform .
> I am do not have these boards, all that I have written before that it's just a theory.
> Firm in which I work, uses its own board with CLPS711X CPU , this board is the
> only way to check for changes on real hardware .

Ok. That makes me a bit nervous... You're removing a driver, which may
(or may not) have been working for other users. And adding a new one,
which may not (or may) work for the other users.

>> I'm still not really happy about it, and I'd much rather see the current
>> driver fixed. But if no one having those boards is up to the task
>> (probably not if they have not been working at all), maybe just ditching
>> the old driver and adding a new is the only way forward.
>>
>> One change that I think would be good is to change the series to first
>> remove the old driver, and then add the new one, with the same file name
>> as the old one. That way git log will show the history for both the new
>> and the old driver.
> 
> In this case git-bisect will be broken. Is this OK?

I think this is such a big change for the users of the driver that it's
not an issue. Of course, kernel should still build at all steps, but I
think it's fine if the fb driver in question will be out for a commit or
two.

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-08 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-12  6:53 [PATCH v2 1/3] video: clps711x: Add new Cirrus Logic CLPS711X framebuffer driver Alexander Shiyan
2014-04-24  5:03 ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-04-24  7:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-24  8:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-30 11:14 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-05-05  5:06 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-07  9:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-05-08 10:14 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-05-16 22:56 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-23 12:31 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-05-23 12:43 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-05-23 13:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 14:10 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-05-23 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 14:26 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-05-23 14:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536B5910.1060403@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).