From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:32:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: simplefb-sunxi: Add sunxi simplefb extensions Message-Id: <547476DA.2030004@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7wfsofw2kCWsX875qbUk5smI4hNj8sm2E" List-Id: References: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1416309051-26784-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1416309051-26784-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --7wfsofw2kCWsX875qbUk5smI4hNj8sm2E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/11/14 13:10, Hans de Goede wrote: > If pre-filled framebuffer nodes are used, the firmware may need extra > properties to find the right node. This documents the properties to use= > for this on sunxi platforms. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > Acked-by: Grant Likely > --- > .../bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++= ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-fram= ebuffer-sunxi.txt >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer= -sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-s= unxi.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..c46ba64 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer-sunxi.= txt > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ > +Sunxi specific Simple Framebuffer bindings > + > +This binding documents sunxi specific extensions to the simple-framebu= ffer > +bindings. The sunxi simplefb u-boot code relies on the devicetree cont= aining > +pre-populated simplefb nodes. > + > +These extensions are intended so that u-boot can select the right node= based > +on which pipeline is being used. As such they are solely intended for > +firmware / bootloader use, and the OS should ignore them. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "allwinner,simple-framebuffer" > +- allwinner,pipeline, one of: Sorry my ignorance, but what's sunxi and what's allwinner? Both names are mixed here. Tomi --7wfsofw2kCWsX875qbUk5smI4hNj8sm2E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUdHbaAAoJEPo9qoy8lh715j8P/0W1HSVZqHUjGSixiFLePszX qQZ/O1VIe9sUbNAuUYSa2B6/OjDV/no/gcIDljDIQ1E2ze/m9AFeTOfTBbHkNnvm EmL6YezuRARJ016EF3J+MwGea+HSMGUPU65ioQL+sqg4gDY1G4NCSCUL8VrLtkG8 FQuBcJZkFjHph0MJCkJt1YgcmMen9tSlcjMVuawqXY0hr7kUFAaFZzVeEWIKDnTr EGoMxQGVziNCXNUU4eATsIQWBK3fUnaBaSDYXbiuloYH4qIvTkj2HnUxHjlveCAK tmolbLJf5pcvWkTQMkFVfJxAAldZPTERkZY3lgDuDZBLqv4+WDnkDYXUtnOQ3Jbc v5nHp0rjVqUlML9E4TwG2PdQaVh09uI0oNK4t1pqNcesZIuBh4s/nL844mGKkoqI 6Ql62VfwVWDEe6S7SdFkRSC+aD3WC5NZwcT//0NliSK/fPo+npQfApzGXISey2Oc dlMWHKt9UX3X+NnUGOohhS8WXyli/3AkCZc6UJ+QqF5zwL3J99auVjSnvcjnwxLi ijnaKaKZtQDGVO1kTyqItMliTve5I11XfpIpubV0RAbTxjFmhZYxWq4O4zorIQPS 07+fPXD+Gbzd+j8udKqMDj4Gp6vLBqNSU1vpnWoHakSbkiaHxAO08B+dTBH7dTBg B5CPOLEOPRGafTOQ2qIZ =jqxW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7wfsofw2kCWsX875qbUk5smI4hNj8sm2E--