From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Longerbeam Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:10:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm_modes: add videomode_from_drm_display_mode Message-Id: <54947827.5050104@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <1418954426-21909-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <1418954426-21909-4-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <1418986984.3165.64.camel@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1418986984.3165.64.camel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Philipp Zabel Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Russell King , Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , Denis Carikli , Jiada Wang , Steve Longerbeam On 12/19/2014 03:03 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(videomode_from_drm_display_mode); > Is it ok for drm_modes to export a function that doesn't start with > drm_ ? We could just rename this to drm_display_mode_to_videomode if > necessary. I can fix it up as I apply it, but I'd like to know which is > preferred. Yeah, drm_display_mode_to_videomode() is probably better, makes it more clear it's part of the DRM kernel interfaces. Steve