linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	shc_work@mail.ru, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	hsweeten@visionengravers.com,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:21:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552660C7.4020805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409110634.GA27407@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]

On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
>>> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>>>
>>> root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
>>> real               0m 0.00s
>>> user               0m 0.00s
>>> sys                0m 0.00s
>>>
>>> on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown exists for
>>> writes. Simple framebuffer did not change at all between 3.15 and
>>> 3.18; resource flags of the framebuffer are still same (0x200).
>>>
>>> If I enable caching on 3.18, it speeds up a bit, to 70msec or
>>> so... Which means problem is not only in caching.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> My first guess was  commit 67dc0d4758e5 ("vt_buffer: drop console buffer
>> copying optimisations"), but this was introduced only in v4.0-rc1.
>>
>> Just in case you encounter another performance regression after upgrading
>> to a more modern kernel ;-)
> 
> :-). I did a git bisect, and it pointed to this. And reverting it
> indeed fixes the problem in 3.18. Problem is still there in 4.0.

Interesting. I can reproduce this also on TI's AM437x board, on 3.14
kernel. Without the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.01s
user    0m 0.00s
sys     0m 0.01s

With the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.19s
user    0m 0.01s
sys     0m 0.17s

> Archit do you know what is going on there? Should the revert be filled
> for 4.0?

(Cc'ing Archit's new email)

> 
> 								Pavel
> 
> commit 981409b25e2a99409b26daa67293ca1cfd5ea0a0
> Author: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 16 14:46:04 2012 +0530
> 
>     fbdev: arm has __raw I/O accessors, use them in fb.h
> 
>     This removes the sparse warnings on arm platforms:
> 
>     warning: cast removes address space of expression
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>  Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
>  Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-07 12:12 simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform Pavel Machek
2015-04-07 12:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-07 14:24   ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-09 11:06   ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-09 11:21     ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-04-09 11:34       ` Tomi Valkeinen
     [not found]         ` <552663C2.70308-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-09 19:51           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-24 13:31             ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-10  7:17         ` Archit Taneja
2015-04-24 13:29           ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-24 13:40             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-24 13:46               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-26 19:31                 ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-28 13:48                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]                   ` <20150428134848.GC12732-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-28 15:28                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-06 10:45                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-06 20:32                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-12  8:52                         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552660C7.4020805@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dinh.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shc_work@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).