From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: put module after running driver callback
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:24:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5603DD55.8080801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441987843-4313-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2000 bytes --]
On 11/09/15 19:10, David Herrmann wrote:
> Currently, for each open() on an fbdev device, we pin the underlying
> fbdev device and driver module. On close(), we release both. This
> guarantees that the fbdev object stays around until the last FD is
> released (even though it might be unregistered already).
>
> However, currently we call module_put() *before* calling put_fb_info().
> This has the side-effect that the driver module might be unloaded before
> put_fb_info() calls into fbinfo->fbops->fb_destroy().
>
> Fix this by keeping the module pinned until after we release our fbdev
> reference. Note that register_framebuffer() and unregister_framebuffer()
> are special as we require the driver to unregister device before
> unloading. Hence, they don't need to pin the module. However, all open
> handlers *have to*.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> index 0705d88..4e78731 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> @@ -1482,13 +1482,16 @@ __acquires(&info->lock)
> __releases(&info->lock)
> {
> struct fb_info * const info = file->private_data;
> + struct module *owner;
>
> mutex_lock(&info->lock);
> if (info->fbops->fb_release)
> info->fbops->fb_release(info,1);
> - module_put(info->fbops->owner);
> + owner = info->fbops->owner;
> mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
> +
> put_fb_info(info);
> + module_put(owner);
> return 0;
> }
Looking at fb_open(), in error case it calls module_put() followed by
put_fb_info(). Is that broken also?
Have you hit this bug, or did you just find it by looking at the code?
In other words, is this for 4.3 fixes, or 4.4. I guess the user needs to
unload the module just at the right time to trigger this bug.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 16:10 [PATCH] fbdev: put module after running driver callback David Herrmann
2015-09-24 11:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-09-25 17:58 ` David Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5603DD55.8080801@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).