linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM"
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:00:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CE816.1060307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bncjemdk.fsf@belgarion.home>

Le 30/09/2015 21:29, Robert Jarzmik a écrit :
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:
> 
>> This reverts commit 68feaca0b13e453aa14ee064c1736202b48b342f.
>> This commit breaks legacy platforms, for which :
>>  (a) no pwm table is added (legacy platforms)
>>  (b) in this case, in pwm_get(), pmw_lookup_list is empty, and therefore
>>      chosen = NULL, and therefore pwm_get() returns NULL, and pwm_get()
>>      returns -EPROBE_DEFER
>>  (c) as a consequence, this code is unreachable in pwm_bl.c :
>>      if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
>> 	ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
>>  	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s:%d(): %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
>>  	if (ret = -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>  		goto err_alloc;
>>
>>  	dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
>>  	pb->legacy = true;
>>  	pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
>>
>> As this code is unreachable, all legacy platforms relying on pwm_id are
>> broken, amongst which pxa have been tested as broken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Thierry, would you have a look please ?
> As I said before, all legacy platform relying on pwm_id are broken. I'd like to
> be sure this lands in the next -rc series.

Well, as I answered on the linux-pwm mailing-list (I was not in copy) here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2744
I wonder if it's not easier to fix the platforms and add the pwm tables...

Otherwise, Boris proposed this fix:
8<-----------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index eff379b..00483d4 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
-		if (ret = -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			goto err_alloc;
 
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
 		pb->legacy = true;
 		pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
 		if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request legacy PWM\n");
-			ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+				ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+
 			goto err_alloc;
 		}
 	}

which is not tested and may add an extra non-valid error log.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-01  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-26 19:24 [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM" Robert Jarzmik
2015-09-30 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01  8:00   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-10-01  9:06     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 17:39     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-05  9:35     ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 11:19       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 12:58         ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 13:30           ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 14:07             ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 15:25               ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 12:39             ` Vladimir Zapolskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560CE816.1060307@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).