From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:58:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] omapdrm/omapfb/omapdss split Message-Id: <56699306.4070101@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gIoo5M64R7mkfLJhevtW0s60nwPMKaRuS" List-Id: References: <1449757535-5674-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> In-Reply-To: To: Rob Clark Cc: Linux Fbdev development list , Laurent Pinchart , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" --gIoo5M64R7mkfLJhevtW0s60nwPMKaRuS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/12/15 16:53, Rob Clark wrote: > It would be nice to see omapdrm eventually using the panel framework, > etc. But I think copy/paste to decouple omapdrm from omapfb/vout as > the first step makes sense. Yes, long term plans include getting rid of the omap specific panel/encoder drivers. But I can't do that as long as omapfb/vout is there, preventing any bigger refactorings. Tomi --gIoo5M64R7mkfLJhevtW0s60nwPMKaRuS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWaZMGAAoJEPo9qoy8lh71vLUQAJDwPHxS68plroXrM3+kwRn7 64pMQMHVhokN3KW39aX5Zc7PuInuq8WrEpcV/4S9MDvRyToVXhERo/Fa4mLO+TD6 xJ9m1DVkBogUMX0KP69lHQIzxOJ2qwSVNWsrKbmv124TbSFwJc/mNASjwkQ04Wp3 Dmol/PgGIRTUctRTBDLZ2PYZRPnlJsigdSLPyZ19EA6Ad5DhsG6KKcmEfUzWzwcq 2OvQd8Z8uu1UgASVG+ShvYyYHkX7B88M2OPCagKtMnPoe4uNd+xhALr1d1qzoCmc ANf7kyA5slpv6/RXGXP6P86oZvYdxqkIWrI2JKm56ZonTvUfBaDwEmIKNbKYjwqT 5F73eYXdY4vgG1Rv0ane3DcvxnKUklQ/ZsPNPetarM3gUYq8k5xMIdf83ilSQ9mq rU6hY+X7c5EXiORjAx9Ql7aTOBKsYup3SNcp8zMSq7BsQ52fhZyTZ3WKFN4NGNTg cZNGsfrdEDmTn8WzVmrmECwyIBY6NXZX4yUnAz8HM/LZUzeQo4Qeqq8ojVFE30CO I4jUPxf1tFVtU4tK8FvHUjmQMfl/jUEPDm2mjMi+NxlTO+VR7rtLLFISLxFmboBp h0fHgjXV5WeAWdnHXwatPL3uRmLJ4Ohou1A3rD/9dO99coqfwgMCu90WfKj/j21h E3XgyA/KhZXccIXNdnjB =v1fB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gIoo5M64R7mkfLJhevtW0s60nwPMKaRuS--