linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: initial devicetree conversion
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:29:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56699A57.9030209@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bna2kmp7.fsf@belgarion.home>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]


On 07/12/15 22:50, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

>> It seems that at least "depth" is missing from the binding document.
> You're right.
> 
> Actually depth is not a "hardware" caracteristic. Moreover it's just used as an
> overlay for pxafb_set_pixfmt() to superseed var->bits_per_pixel. I'm wondering
> if the right path for of_get_pxafb_mode_info() would be to remove completely
> depth, and leave it initialized at 0 for the DT case.
> 
> What do you think of this approach ? The other one would be to modify the
> binding, and yet I feel this depth doesn't belong to the binding, it's my patch
> which requires another spin IMHO.

Yes, we should avoid non-hardware relate properties in the .dts files if
at all possible. If the driver works fine without the property, I think
it's fine to remove it. If it is required it needs to be added to the
binding document.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17 20:32 [PATCH v5 1/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: loosen the platform data bond Robert Jarzmik
2015-11-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: initial devicetree conversion Robert Jarzmik
2015-12-07 16:28   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-07 20:50     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-12-10 15:29       ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-12-10 17:34         ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56699A57.9030209@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).