linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] video: exynos: fix modular build
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:12:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D46DFD.6090706@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456490307-823812-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1696 bytes --]

Hi,

On 26/02/16 14:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The s6e8ax0 driver has a dependency on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE,
> which can be configured as a loadable module, so we have to
> make the driver a tristate symbol as well, to avoid this error:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `s6e8ax0_probe':
> :(.text+0x23a48): undefined reference to `devm_backlight_device_register'

If a 'bool' Kconfig option depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, shouldn't
the Kconfig dependency take care of having BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE as
built-in?

> This also means we get another error from a missing export, which
> this fixes as well:
> 
> ERROR: "exynos_mipi_dsi_register_lcd_driver" [drivers/video/fbdev/exynos/s6e8ax0.ko] undefined!
> 
> The drivers are all written to be loadable modules already,
> except the Kconfig options for that are missing, which makes
> the patch really easy.

Looks and sound fine, except doesn't this tell that the drivers have
never been tested as modules? Did you or someone else actually test these?

> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/exynos/Makefile b/drivers/video/fbdev/exynos/Makefile
> index b5b1bd228abb..02d8dc522fea 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/exynos/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/exynos/Makefile
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
>  # Makefile for the exynos video drivers.
>  #
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_MIPI_DSI)		+= exynos_mipi_dsi.o exynos_mipi_dsi_common.o \
> -				     	exynos_mipi_dsi_lowlevel.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_MIPI_DSI)		+= exynos-mipi-dsi-mod.o
> +
> +exynos-mipi-dsi-mod-objs		+= exynos_mipi_dsi.o exynos_mipi_dsi_common.o \
> +					   exynos_mipi_dsi_lowlevel.o

Hmm, why is this makefile change needed?

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-29 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-26 12:38 [PATCH v2] video: exynos: fix modular build Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-29 16:12 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2016-02-29 16:39   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-29 16:55     ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D46DFD.6090706@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).