From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] backlight: gpio: allow to probe non-pdata devices from board files
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:02:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57229b83-c876-1042-2866-1a63e6654bd4@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625163434.13620-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On 25/06/2019 17:34, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>
> Currently we can only probe devices that either use device tree or pass
> platform data to probe(). Rename gpio_backlight_probe_dt() to
> gpio_backlight_probe_prop() and use generic device properties instead
> of OF specific helpers.
This has already been done in (which IIRC did get queued for the next
release):
https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg215050.html
> Reverse the logic checking the presence of
> platform data in probe(). This way we can probe devices() registered
> from machine code that neither have a DT node nor use platform data.
Andy's patch did not reverse this logic... but it does check
pdev->dev.fwnode rather than of_node .
Daniel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
> index b9300f3e1ee6..654c19d3a81d 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
> @@ -54,15 +54,14 @@ static const struct backlight_ops gpio_backlight_ops = {
> .check_fb = gpio_backlight_check_fb,
> };
>
> -static int gpio_backlight_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
> +static int gpio_backlight_probe_prop(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> enum gpiod_flags flags;
> int ret;
>
> - gbl->def_value = of_property_read_bool(np, "default-on");
> + gbl->def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
> flags = gbl->def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
>
> gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, flags);
> @@ -86,26 +85,15 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct backlight_properties props;
> struct backlight_device *bl;
> struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
> - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!pdata && !np) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "failed to find platform data or device tree node.\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> gbl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (gbl = NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> gbl->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> - if (np) {
> - ret = gpio_backlight_probe_dt(pdev, gbl);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - } else {
> + if (pdata) {
> /*
> * Legacy platform data GPIO retrieveal. Do not expand
> * the use of this code path, currently only used by one
> @@ -126,6 +114,10 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> gbl->gpiod = gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio);
> if (!gbl->gpiod)
> return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + ret = gpio_backlight_probe_prop(pdev, gbl);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> }
>
> memset(&props, 0, sizeof(props));
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-02 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 16:34 [PATCH 00/12] ARM: davinci: da850-evm: remove more legacy GPIO calls Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 01/12] backlight: gpio: allow to probe non-pdata devices from board files Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-28 12:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-07-02 9:02 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/12] backlight: gpio: use a helper variable for &pdev->dev Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-28 12:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-07-02 9:05 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 03/12] backlight: gpio: pull the non-pdata device probing code into probe() Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-27 11:14 ` Linus Walleij
2019-06-28 12:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-07-02 9:11 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 04/12] ARM: davinci: refresh davinci_all_defconfig Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/12] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable GPIO backlight Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 06/12] ARM: davinci: da850-evm: model the backlight GPIO as an actual device Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-27 11:16 ` Linus Walleij
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 07/12] fbdev: da8xx: add support for a regulator Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-28 13:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 08/12] ARM: davinci: da850-evm: switch to using a fixed regulator for lcdc Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-27 11:18 ` Linus Walleij
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 10/12] fbdev: da8xx-fb: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-28 13:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 11/12] fbdev: da8xx-fb: drop a redundant if Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-28 13:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-06-25 16:34 ` [PATCH 12/12] fbdev: da8xx: use resource management for dma Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-06-28 13:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-07-01 14:52 ` [PATCH 00/12] ARM: davinci: da850-evm: remove more legacy GPIO calls Sekhar Nori
2019-07-02 6:36 ` Lee Jones
2019-07-02 10:06 ` Daniel Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57229b83-c876-1042-2866-1a63e6654bd4@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).