From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Thompson Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:41:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: Set pin to sleep state when powered down Message-Id: <5b0f8bb3-e7b0-52c1-1f2f-9709992b76fc@linaro.org> List-Id: References: <20190522163428.7078-1-paul@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: <20190522163428.7078-1-paul@crapouillou.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paul Cercueil , Thierry Reding , Lee Jones , Jingoo Han , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, od@zcrc.me, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 22/05/2019 17:34, Paul Cercueil wrote: > When the driver probes, the PWM pin is automatically configured to its > default state, which should be the "pwm" function. At which point in the probe... and by who? > However, at this > point we don't know the actual level of the pin, which may be active or > inactive. As a result, if the driver probes without enabling the > backlight, the PWM pin might be active, and the backlight would be > lit way before being officially enabled. > > To work around this, if the probe function doesn't enable the backlight, > the pin is set to its sleep state instead of the default one, until the > backlight is enabled. Whenk the backlight is disabled, the pin is reset > to its sleep state. Doesn't this workaround result in a backlight flash between whatever enables it and the new code turning it off again? > > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil > --- > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > index fb45f866b923..422f7903b382 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -50,6 +51,8 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struct pwm_bl_data *pb) > struct pwm_state state; > int err; > > + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(pb->dev); > + > pwm_get_state(pb->pwm, &state); > if (pb->enabled) > return; > @@ -90,6 +93,8 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb) > > regulator_disable(pb->power_supply); > pb->enabled = false; > + > + pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(pb->dev); > } > > static int compute_duty_cycle(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness) > @@ -626,6 +631,10 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > backlight_update_status(bl); > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl); > + > + if (bl->props.power = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN) > + pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(&pdev->dev); Didn't backlight_update_status(bl) already do this? Daniel. > + > return 0; > > err_alloc: >