From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:56:25 +0000 Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions Message-Id: <62306606-9e30-d33d-d059-07fdcdbaae92@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <1511809633.32426.70.camel@perches.com> <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com> <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Julia Lawall , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "Andrew F. Davis" , Tomi Valkeinen , Joe Perches , Arvind Yadav >> I got an other impression. The probability for disagreements is increasing >> in relation to the number of contributors to which I show change possibilities. > > No. You should learn from the previous submissions what concerns people > have and address them up front. The concerns can vary as contributors and changes are different. How would you like to “address” the data structure for a default allocation failure report finally? Regards, Markus