From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:25:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm, fbdev: rework dependencies Message-Id: <877dy9ynre.fsf@intel.com> List-Id: References: <20200417155553.675905-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20200417171453.GS3456981@phenom.ffwll.local> <20200417190854.GI26002@ziepe.ca> <87y2qq1smt.fsf@intel.com> <20200421122726.GW3456981@phenom.ffwll.local> <87a735yp0f.fsf@intel.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Vetter , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Marek Vasut , Linux Fbdev development list , Daniel Drake , Arnd Bergmann , Jason Gunthorpe , David Airlie , Masahiro Yamada , Nicolas Pitre , Saeed Mahameed , Thomas Hellstrom , dri-devel , Linux-Renesas , Andrzej Hajda , Kieran Bingham , VMware Graphics , Laurent Pinchart , Haojian Zhuang , Jens Frederich , Robert Jarzmik , Daniel Mack On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Daniel Vetter wrote: > To clarify what I was aiming for with my mail: I'm not worried about > fbdev here, I'm just worried that this will come back, and we'll grow > select somewhere else until it's become a big & totally horrible mess. > I think a lot of the backlight selects have also grown because of > this, so this isn't just a one-off I think. > > If Arnd is happy to play "Kconfig select" whack-a-mole ever once in a > while (and deal with the intermediate compile horrors while everyone > upgrades) I'm ok with this landing. Just not terribly happy if the > underlying issue isn't fixed. And I'll keep ignoring the IS_REACHABLE() patches that make i915 build with a config that should not exist. ;) BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center