From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:21:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: pwm: reject legacy pwm request for device defined in dt Message-Id: <878u775dkv.fsf@belgarion.home> List-Id: References: <1444652943-19712-1-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> <561BB2BC.9090907@atmel.com> <20151012153029.62f948d2@bbrezillon> <561BBB9F.6060808@mentor.com> <20151012160608.41f04553@bbrezillon> <561BC177.2050000@mentor.com> <20151012171931.3fb922d2@bbrezillon> <561BD282.70305@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <561BD282.70305@mentor.com> (Vladimir Zapolskiy's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:32:18 +0300") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Vladimir Zapolskiy , Lee Jones Cc: Boris Brezillon , Nicolas Ferre , Thierry Reding , Jingoo Han , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Vladimir Zapolskiy writes: > Robert, > > because you found a regression in the related area of code on a > platform, which uses legacy PWM API, could you please confirm that three > patches applied in a row don't break anything for you, the changes are: > > * Nicolas' 68feaca0b1 ("backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while > requesting the PWM") > * Thierry' https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/5/319 > * and this one is the last in the series: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2813 I confirm, my backlight works again with it : Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik Cheers. -- Robert