From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FABA2C0F8A for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757501174; cv=none; b=qsZFwRCmbr+BsIevZ3cIERF5qdI4xbg+MvyYQ8EDJFafRoEMVyNkexKYZNrL4Bs1enD+0LV0Ww505HPYbj0vybBdERwiy7+e2LGc3IUGwuafe8mo3Ddyt/6cG7/1cZ4I8umXO2ysmoumHXi3F53Ji9yNOXjzLO7O3QSCMk4KQGo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757501174; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YdQDjKnCp0fZZEDL6h7rSAoz3IU0LZop9X2eKSzS2tg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V3WtyfZkDlmy+MsBXmmLU3Erpm7NhImqm8Y16UBpqFJTJB4Frq1T5CzMJQ56xKaBED9gTxmOpMlgntJGvQ7mHy0lvdRyQhGuuwCM318xN4gdq62+v5z3+oJou3MIDaW9hvqM/2cmEBf/31IUKZ5nMRNwxw164wrkiDGcXFFzkO8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Xr012LlV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Xr012LlV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1757501170; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ish3TOdF5itkEce/x1a+uOeE11uGbtv2vXkIso/jAMo=; b=Xr012LlVME+G5KE53VkVKcXsTgQr7rHHsplHBscAVTHICNCy0lKfEu0DfpSAbIHhkRFyPd TC2RW59ixnnXpAahfQOPEFfEyUFq792/LkiOY6hD14X5ovve2ons0pgQDqTz8pV3YBjI6e VwH0UgRG9v/g2qWFeFDhWAgnynxC7/M= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-137-HeQYsz9QOXakLk1UCKPBTg-1; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 06:46:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: HeQYsz9QOXakLk1UCKPBTg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: HeQYsz9QOXakLk1UCKPBTg_1757501168 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45de07b831dso22745775e9.1 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:46:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757501168; x=1758105968; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ish3TOdF5itkEce/x1a+uOeE11uGbtv2vXkIso/jAMo=; b=Z9WuX8gyzKl+9qLVN3nRWRxs0doD3ITha6VQy6/sRxAWIK34bbWopJTjT1hOsw9ymE NTGe2o7Amr7En/kAuIm5cOxQXtAKIp/+bSdTabMwwuAzaTPB4NQoFgz2xYyDzHGvcVWU /VQNrQw1QARvuU3EdzvTMQIqn45WKeBLevYrxxh0kTdMgcmNz4sDcP0PnnDv9N94Fxgw dFWW6kIam1X2bh0yArumg0B2p0sc+j+F9CwZbbaVEtcK+sHqS6Zz40eBvoKRh2KGs/vP o1WNoQnylr0/vVylKK1P05XqsuxnlopslyYAzH3IGDQrxdbeHp7iLw5ZPq3z50M7ieWP 06eg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUc18PDhg9RTSukLIaFEtTHsmebgc7pvKMH+xwtX2lYpPkV0eC3xwrcum42Wr3sguWvZfkTEiiNtO9hzg==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxUlRtmWnlSvsm363yZ4fyOW/elRcRBEi4NtKQsTrxeqJgEHG4z ry6kPwu6wJTcKZzcF0oxLabWL+rGbkf3JT8Lfjq0Jr5cfcA5UE4daOcXCaLvyX2MGc8vooFM7h6 7cpUFJR4T1LTxWzl4g08EmmLj5MkE+Q2JchG2BFbBHWo/yqHoJcPGnBj7Qn0g5m9W X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv/MW5MNT4t1WPH80FoGolLm0kOAXqoNTxgoKtA9Kzqww8ygXAnpfOuHKcbc7V 8I5QK6ytKIN4B/UmpGXhvFRiDhVXyVHXi7B2CGSe48MsDJ+9IE2U1bCG2gsn2bEJ2SRI9X0MosV tlKFuxsQaKtEP9CWS2ZQDw4jqw9a3RfNjkvnxojtApgnWHePmrkQ3tBv9tCrc6OtaOpRir0IIdQ 4miPAhvo7dwZMc6NgokCbbVaKca535EzTBVXUn/25VggSeEAAHA/y3HEN+hHtwM5XTD0ODpU/zG lPYEzGxqb6UewcsF2FYUWvlgWc+B1mvusyX/xpi96okzAQb0KafRllEQoLY9euQ49FkfSumbHgX mD5sdXcIMBB0FBSvLjPT66Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:45cc:b0:459:dde3:1a55 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45dddec78d3mr134563105e9.24.1757501168138; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:46:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE41It7Gch3Cc7HmzlNTf33KcOKcEcqR+1x/JRLAyd/4r51Mnyjg/51A7Gwi/T9TvTKWE/bSA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:45cc:b0:459:dde3:1a55 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45dddec78d3mr134562745e9.24.1757501167668; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (62-151-111-63.jazzfree.ya.com. [62.151.111.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45df81d193esm23564835e9.6.2025.09.10.03.46.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:46:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: Brett A C Sheffield , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Simona Vetter , Helge Deller , Thomas Zimmermann , Lee Jones , Murad Masimov , Yongzhen Zhang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin , Brett A C Sheffield Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs" In-Reply-To: <20250910095124.6213-5-bacs@librecast.net> References: <20250910095124.6213-3-bacs@librecast.net> <20250910095124.6213-5-bacs@librecast.net> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:46:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87frcuegb7.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Brett A C Sheffield writes: Hello Brett, > This reverts commit 13d28e0c79cbf69fc6f145767af66905586c1249. > > Commit ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when > removing conflicting FBs") was backported to 5.15.y LTS. This causes a > regression where all virtual consoles stop responding during boot at: > > "Populating /dev with existing devices through uevents ..." > > Reverting the commit fixes the regression. > > Signed-off-by: Brett A C Sheffield > --- In the other email you said: > Newer stable kernels with this > patch (6.1.y, 6.6.y, 6.12,y, 6.15.y, 6.16.y) and mainline are unaffected. But are you proposing to revert the mentioned commit in mainline too or just in the 5.15.y LTS tree ? -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat