From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Cercueil Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 10:01:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] MIPS: jz4740: Remove custom GPIO code Message-Id: <8944dd20e8ae6ed705dcf69e9f0ed4fd@mail.crapouillou.net> List-Id: References: <20170117231421.16310-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20170117231421.16310-14-paul@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Linus Walleij Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ralf Baechle , Ulf Hansson , Boris Brezillon , Thierry Reding , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Maarten ter Huurne , Lars-Peter Clausen , Paul Burton , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MIPS , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan Le 2017-01-19 10:07, Linus Walleij a =C3=A9crit : > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Paul Cercueil =20 > wrote: >=20 >> All the drivers for the various hardware elements of the jz4740 SoC=20 >> have been modified to use the pinctrl framework for their pin=20 >> configuration needs. As such, this platform code is now unused and can=20 >> be deleted. Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil >=20 > I feel I might have come across as a bit harsh in the previous review=20 > of the > patches leading up to this one. In that case I'm sorry. >=20 > I can clearly see that the intent of the series is to remove this=20 > hopelessly > idiomatic code from the MIPS hurdle, and move these systems over > to standard frameworks. >=20 > In a way, if I look at the kernel as a whole, it would likely look=20 > better > after these patches were merged, than before. Even with the > shortcomings I painted out in the previous review comments. >=20 > A very complicated piece of messy code is cut from MIPS. >=20 > I think this is very valuable work and well worth persuing, so please > go ahead and work with the series, your effort is very much=20 > appreciated! >=20 > Yours, > Linus Walleij Well thank you for your very constructive criticism ;) And for your=20 review. I'll submit a v2 very soon - I don't want to miss the 4.11 merge. Regards, -Paul