From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 17:44:52 +0000
Subject: Re: [0/4] video-UDLFB: Adjustments for five function implementations
Message-Id: <8c2a6370-29f5-9486-2239-177b55d61f7a@users.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: <linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org>
References: <CGME20171124204825epcas1p41626d598b6e437dfb4c6b648e3730cc1@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
 <1768474.zA76iyE2Y1@amdc3058>
 <ea9813ee-a5a8-7e35-bac5-b2e0652f6602@users.sourceforge.net>
 <3534828.CjlOGYDRrE@amdc3058>
In-Reply-To: <3534828.CjlOGYDRrE@amdc3058>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Bernie Thompson <bernie@plugable.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

>> * Do you find a Linux allocation failure report insufficient in this use case?
> 
> Yes,

Interesting …


> there is more information available currently in the driver and
> I see no real improvement in removing it.
> 
>> * Are you looking for any more clarification?
> 
> I will not apply any of such patches for now. The only exception
> being drivers that support hardware that can have only one instance
> in the system …

Thanks for your feedback.


> and the patch needs to be reviewed by a someone else than the author).

I am curious if this will ever happen again for my update suggestions
in such a software area.

Regards,
Markus