From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: efifb: Fix a use-after-free due early fb_info cleanup
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 18:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <981d7ed4-8554-73ca-bfd1-2d89e4e91af3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220507162053.auo2idd5twvnxatj@ldmartin-desk2>
Hello Lucas,
On 5/7/22 18:20, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:22:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
>> than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
>> the fb_info in the .remove handler instead of doing it in .fb_destroy.
>>
>> But ironically that change introduced yet another use-after-free since the
>> fb_info was still used after the free.
>>
>> This should fix for good by freeing the fb_info at the end of the handler.
>>
>> Fixes: d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove")
>
> are these patches going through any CI before being applied? Maybe would
> be a good idea to cc intel-gfx mailing list on these fixes to have Intel
> CI to pick them up for some tests?
>
I Cc'ed intel-gfx for this particular patch. I should had done it for the
previous patches too, but I wasn't aware that Cc'ing that list would make
it run on your CI.
I tested locally the offending patch on an EFI platform before applying it
and I don't know why it didn't fail there. Sorry all for the inconvenience.
> pushed to drm-misc-fixes where the previous patch was applied.
>
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-07 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 13:22 [PATCH] fbdev: efifb: Fix a use-after-free due early fb_info cleanup Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-06 13:39 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-06 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-05-06 16:50 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-07 16:20 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-05-07 16:40 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=981d7ed4-8554-73ca-bfd1-2d89e4e91af3@redhat.com \
--to=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).