From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: waitforVBlank, how does this even work? Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:51:11 -0500 Message-ID: <9e47339105030209514b7a3f4c@mail.gmail.com> References: <9e473391050301215019081bce@mail.gmail.com> <9e473391050302090926854d95@mail.gmail.com> <9e47339105030209302701e9b5@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Jon Smirl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: dri-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: dri-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Vladimir Dergachev Cc: fbdev , DRI developer's list , esellers@users.sourceforge.net On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:45:54 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:15:18 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev > > wrote: > >>> I would find it useful if someone came up with a standard kernel space > >>> V4L radeon driver instead of the Gatos stuff. > >> > >> By "standard" you mean "self-contained", right ? > > > > One that doesn't depend on X being there. > > > > Can one be build now that just ignores the memory management hooks? > > Sure, but you would have to give up using X on that card. Is memory management the only reason you need to give up on X? -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click --