linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] boot-screen override by "34db50e55656 efifb: Copy the ACPI BGRT"
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:13:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e9e269d-6ac7-7826-ecd5-acc164025429@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANq1E4TiMSY=udGJWZoDzMhdsRjC==QCRFPO+Oja7KoyBX-6fg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 03-09-18 17:11, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hey
> 
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:47 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03-09-18 16:16, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 03, 2018 03:23:38 PM David Herrmann wrote:
>>>> Hey
>>>>
>>>> Since this commit:
>>>>
>>>>       34db50e55656 efifb: Copy the ACPI BGRT
>>>>
>>>> the kernel will override boot-splashs unasked. This breaks the
>>>> graphical boot-process on our setups. In particular, we have a setup
>>>> where an efi-boot-entry draws the early boot-splash on-screen, then
>>>> hands-over to the linux-kernel + initrd. The boot-splash daemon in the
>>>> initrd then takes over control of possible animations.
>>>>
>>>> With the mentioned commit compiled in, the kernel will redraw the
>>>> firmware logo on screen at a random time without any way to intervene.
>>>
>>> You have CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER=y (the deferred
>>> console takeover support introduced in v4,19-rc1). I assume that this
>>> is intended?
>>>
>>>> What is the intention of this commit? Why is the kernel re-drawing the
>>>> firmware logo unasked? If someone during the boot-process draws
>>>> content on the screen, I would prefer if the kernel does not clear
>>>> that on driver load.
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * If fbcon deffered console takeover is configured, the intent is for the
>>> + * framebuffer to show the boot graphics (e.g. vendor logo) until there is some
>>> + * (error) message to display. But the boot graphics may have been destroyed by
>>> + * e.g. option ROM output, detect this and restore the boot graphics.
>>> + */
>>> +#if defined CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER && \
>>> +    defined CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT
>>> ...
>>> +static void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info)
>>> ...
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info) {}
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>> Can we either provide an option to disable this feature, or revert the commit?
>>>
>>> Hans?
>>
>> We use the ACPI bgrt extension to get the logo to draw and then
>> draw it since some devices rely on the OS to draw it and otherwise we
>> just end up with a blackscreen when doing silent / flickerfree boot.
>>
>> Ideally you would be able to get your vendor to put the logo in firmware
>> in the ACPI bgrt extension, then you also do not need to play any tricks
>> with an EFI binary drawing your own logo. But I can understand if you don't
>> have control over this, so you need to do this with the EFI binary trick.
>>
>> I can also understand that you want to use deferred console takeover
>> in a setup like yours to avoid fbcon messing up what is on the display
>> during boot, that is exactly what it is for. So I think a reasonable
>> approach here is to add a kernel commandline option, say:
>>
>> videoïifb:nobgrt
>>
>> David, would that work for you?
> 
> That would be perfect!

Ok, I just send out a patch for this with you in the Cc.

Sorry for taking a bit long to write the patch.

Regards,

Hans

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-12  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20180903132353epcas4p373e876f1b52dbed6df7bd3acc73fcdf4@epcas4p3.samsung.com>
2018-09-03 13:23 ` [REGRESSION] boot-screen override by "34db50e55656 efifb: Copy the ACPI BGRT" David Herrmann
2018-09-03 14:16   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-09-03 14:47     ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-03 15:11       ` David Herrmann
2018-09-12  9:13         ` Hans de Goede [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e9e269d-6ac7-7826-ecd5-acc164025429@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).