From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] fbdev: Make fb-notify a no-op if CONFIG_FB=n
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:14:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAEAJfCOWm4zOZ-cu40bR0o8O4QBZeMzrJyQiLoR85510QZP5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448421108-3437-1-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Tomi,
Thanks for looking at this patch.
On 7 December 2015 at 13:01, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
>
> On 25/11/15 05:11, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> There's no point in having support for framebuffer notifications
>> is CONFIG_FB is disabled. This commit adds the necessary stubs
>> for code to link properly when CONFIG_FB=n and moves fb-notify.o
>> to be built only when CONFIG_FB=y.
>
> Why do you add CONFIG_FB_NOTIFY, isn't plain CONFIG_FB enough? Oh,
> right, to have it built-in even if FB is a module.
>
Right.
> But this makes me wonder, why is fb_notify in obj-y list currently.
> Nobody just bothered to make it build only when needed, or has there
> been some use for it earlier... The commit descriptions in git history
> suggest the former.
>
Here's the patch that created fb_notify.c and put it in obj-y.
[PATCH] fbdev: statically link the framebuffer notification functions
The backlight and lcd subsystems can be notified by the framebuffer layer
of blanking events. However, these subsystems, as a whole, can function
independently from the framebuffer layer. But in order to enable to the
lcd and backlight subsystems, the framebuffer has to be compiled also,
effectively sucking in a huge amount of unneeded code.
To prevent dependency problems, separate out the framebuffer notification
mechanism from the framebuffer layer and permanently link it to the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
> Actually, looks like fb_notify.c was originally made to solve the same
> problem as your patch solves, but by separating the notify code from the
> main fbdev code. So I still wonder, was there some reason to keep the
> notification code built instead of having stub functions.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
I can't see any valid reason to keep the code around, since there's no
way it can be used.
Let's see if Ccing Antonino and Andrew -as per that commit- helps.
--
Ezequiel GarcÃa, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-07 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 3:11 [PATCH RESEND] fbdev: Make fb-notify a no-op if CONFIG_FB=n Ezequiel Garcia
2015-12-07 16:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-07 16:14 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2015-12-10 15:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAEAJfCOWm4zOZ-cu40bR0o8O4QBZeMzrJyQiLoR85510QZP5g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).