From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SIMRAN SINGHAL Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 19:23:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging: gdm724x: Remove unnecessary else after return Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1488219268-3006-1-git-send-email-singhalsimran0@gmail.com> <1488219268-3006-5-git-send-email-singhalsimran0@gmail.com> <1488224468.25838.11.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Joe Perches Cc: Greg KH , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:44 +0530, simran singhal wrote: >>> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally >>> useful after a break or return. >> >>> This was done using Coccinelle: >>> @@ >>> expression e2; >>> statement s1; >>> @@ >>> if(e2) { ... return ...; } >>> -else >>> s1 >> [] >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_endian.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_endian.c >> [] >>> @@ -26,30 +26,26 @@ __dev16 gdm_cpu_to_dev16(struct gdm_endian *ed, u16 x) >>> { >>> if (ed->dev_ed = ENDIANNESS_LITTLE) >>> return (__force __dev16)cpu_to_le16(x); >>> - else >>> - return (__force __dev16)cpu_to_be16(x); >>> + return (__force __dev16)cpu_to_be16(x); >> >> again, not a checkpatch message for any of the >> suggested modified hunks. >> I am not getting what's the problem in removing else or may be I am wrong you just want to say that I should change the commit message.