From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Herrmann Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 15:50:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] x86 platform framebuffers Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1375445127-15480-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com> <51FC1A91.3080401@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <51FC1A91.3080401@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stephen Warren Cc: linux-kernel , David Airlie , Geert Uytterhoeven , Peter Jones , Tomi Valkeinen , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Hi On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/02/2013 06:05 AM, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> I cut down my previous series to no longer include the SimpleDRM driver. If >> anyone is interested, you can find it here: >> http://lwn.net/Articles/558104/ >> I will resend it once these preparation patches are in. >> >> Changes since v2: >> - added common x86 formats (reported by hpa) (patch #5) > > So I assume this is V3; patch subject doesn't say so:-) Whoops, my bad, sorry. It's v3, yes. > ... >> @Stephen: I wasn't sure whether you tested the efi/vesa framebuffer changes, >> too, so I didn't add your tested-by there. And I changed patch #5 so I dropped >> it there, too. Thanks for testing! > > Yes, I'm only testing on ARM platforms using simplefb, not any x86 > platforms. This latest version seems to work fine, so feel free to > re-apply by tested-by where appropriate. That's what I thought. Thanks for verifying. Cheers David