Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] matroxfb, 2.6 and 2.4

Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] matroxfb, 2.6 and 2.4

[Petr Vandrovec]

On  4 Aug 04 at 13:51, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> 
> > > And for DRI I do not understand X code well enough to find where
> > > tests which should prevent X from hitting hardware should be added.
> 
> do you mean that usually it shouldn't change anything?

It should not change anything if X are not visible - X released video
card ownership when they switched back to text console, but they keep
banging adapter (they switch it to color depth X are using, reprogram
line length to the value they use, and foreground/background colors to
values they use) although matroxfb now has ownership.

Maybe you should try whether crash happens if you boot with 
'video=matroxfb:noaccel', but as you said that it occurs without DRI
too, it is not source of problem.
                                                    Petr
                                                    



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com

Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] matroxfb, 2.6 and 2.4

[Jonas Meurer]

On 04/08/2004 Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Maybe you should try whether crash happens if you boot with 
> 'video=matroxfb:noaccel', but as you said that it occurs without DRI
> too, it is not source of problem.

exactly, so dri is not the problem.

bye
 jonas


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com