From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Meelis Roos Subject: Re: atyfb and radeonfb Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:16:40 +0200 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3DCBD804.8050109@ntlworld.com> Return-path: Received: from tartu.cyber.ee ([193.40.6.68]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18BAe9-0000dJ-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 01:14:17 -0800 Received: Message by Barricade tartu.cyber.ee with ESMTP id gAB97M414889 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:07:22 +0200 Received: from mroos by roos.tartu-labor with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BAgS-00009G-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:16:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3DCBD804.8050109@ntlworld.com> Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net SN> Is atyfb in 2.4 known to work with recent Mach64 chips like Rage XL? I did run a sparc64 with builtin Rage XL for about a year (2.4.18 time), it worked fine. Don't remember the type of the RAM but it had 8M. At first I had a problem with pixel clock frequency - the kernel new a higer value for XL than the sparc64 implemented and so the description of XL in kernel driver got changed for lower clock. But I doubt this helps you :( -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html